Laserfiche WebLink
Clarificationsandlnterpretations: : to ENGINEER written notice of intention to appeal from <br />9.4. ENGINEER wiU issue with reasonable promptness such a decision. <br />such written clarifications or interpretations of the require- <br />taunts of the Contract Documents (in the form of Drawings Decisions on Disputes: <br />or othep, vise) as ENGINEER may determine necessary, which <br />shall be consistent with or reasonably inferable from the 9. Il. ENGINEER will be the initial interpreter of the <br />overall intent of the Contract Documents. If CONTRACTOR requirements of the Contract Documents and judge of the <br />believes that a whuen clarification or interpretation justifies acceptability of the Work thereunder. Claims, disputes and <br />an increase in the Contract Price or an extension of thc other matters relating to the acceptability of the Work or the <br />Contract Time and the parties are unable to agree to the interpretation of the requirements of the Contract Documents <br />amount or extent thereof, CONTRACTOR may make a claim pertaining to the performance and furnishing of the Work and <br />therefor as provided in Article 11 or Article 12. claims under Articles 11 and 12 in respect of changes in the <br /> Contract Price or Contract Time will be referred initially to <br /> ENGINEER in writing with a request for a formal decision <br />Authorized Variations in Work: in accordance with this paragraph, which ENGINEER will <br />9.5. ENGINEER may authorize minor variations in the render in writing within a reasonable time. Written notice of <br />Work from the requirements of the Contract Documents which each such claim, dispute and other matter will be delivered <br />do not involve an adjustment in the Contract Price or the by the claimant to ENGINEER and the other party to the <br />Contract Time and are consistent with the overall intent of Agreement promptly (but in no eyent later than thirty days) <br />the Contract Documents. These may be accomplished by a after the occurrence of the event giving rise thereto, and <br />Field Order and will be binding on OWNER, and also on written supporting data will be submitted to ENGINEER and <br />CONTRACTOR who shall perform the Work involved theotherpartywithinsixtydaysaftersuchoccurrenceunless <br />promptly. It' CONTRACTOR believes that a Field Order ENGINEER allows an additional period of time to ascertain <br />justifies an increase in the Contract Price or an extension of more accurate data in support of the claim. <br />the Contract Time and the parties are unable to agree as to <br />the amount or extent thereof, CONTRACTOR may make a 9.12. When functioning as interpreter and judge under <br />claim therefor as provided in Article 11 or 12. paragraphs 9.10 and 9. I I, ENGINEER will not show par- <br /> tiality to OWNER or CONTRACTOR and will not be liable <br /> in connection with any interpretation or decision rendered in <br />Rejecting Defective Work: good faith in such capacity. The rendering of a decision by <br />9.6. ENGINEER will have authority to disapprove or ENGINEER porauant to paragraphs 9. I0 and 9.11 with respect <br />reject Work which ENGINEER believes to be defective, and to any such claim, dispute or other matter (except any which <br />willalsohave authoritytorequlrespeeialinspectionor testing have been waived by the making or acceptance of final pay- <br />of the Work as provided in paragraph 13.9, whether or not ment as provided in paragraph 14.16) will be a condition <br />the Work is fabricated, installed or completed, precedent to any exercise by OWNER or CONTRACTOR <br /> of such rights or remedies as either may otherwise have under <br /> the Contract Doouments or by Laws or Regulations in respect <br />SlOop Drawings, Change Orders and Payments: of any such claim, dispute or other matter. <br />9.7 In connection with ENGINEER's responsibility for <br />Shop Drawings and ~amples, see paragraphs 6.23 through <br />6.28 inclusive. LirnRations on ENGINEER's Responsibilities: <br /> <br /> 9.13. Neither ENGINEER's authority to act under this <br />9.8. In connection with ENGINEER's responsibilities as Article 9 or elsewhere in the Contract Documents nor any <br />to Change Orders, see Articles 10, I l and 12. decision made by ENGINEER in good faith either to exemise <br /> or not exercise such authority shall give rise to any duty or <br />9.9. In connection with ENGINEER's responsibilities in responsibility of ENGINEER to CONTRACTOR, any Sub- <br />respect of Applications for Payment, etc., see Article 14. contractor, any Supplier, or any other person or organLzation <br /> performing any of the Work, or to any surety for any of them. <br /> <br />Determlnatlonsfor Unit Prices: 9.14. Whenever in the Contract Documents the terms"as <br />9.10. ENGINEER will determine the actual quantities ordered", "as directed", "as required", "as allowed", "as <br />and classifications of Unit Price Work performed by CON- approved' or terms of like effect or import are used, or the <br />TRACTOR. ENGINEER will review with CONTRACTOR adjectives "reasonable", "suitable", "acceptable", <br />ENGINEER's preliminary determinations on such matters or "satisfactory" or adjectives of like effect or import are <br />before rendering a written decision thereon (by recommen- used todescribearequlrement, direction, revieworjudgment <br />dation of an Application for Payment or otherwise). ENGI- of ENGINEER as to the Work, it is intended that such <br />NEER's written decisions thereon will be final and binding requirement, direction, review or judgment will be solely to <br />upon OWNER and CONTRACTOR, unless, within ten days evaluate the Work for compliance with the Contract Doou- <br />after the date of any such decision, either OWNER or CON- taunts (unless there is a specific statement indicating o~her- <br />TRACTOR delivers to the other party to the Agreement and wise). The use of any such ten'n or adjective shall not be <br /> <br /> <br />