My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-B Comprehensive Plan
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2001-2010
>
2001
>
08 - August
>
August 13, 2001
>
02-B Comprehensive Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/12/2012 11:10:16 AM
Creation date
6/18/2001 8:31:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGENDA
Item Number
2-B
AGENDA - Type
STUDY
Description
Comprehensive Master Plan
AGENDA - Date
8/13/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
134
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Comprehensive Plan, City of Paris, Texas <br />Future Land Use <br />When regulating new commercial development on arterial roads from the Loop 286, <br />protect the capacity of the road to carry arterial traffic. <br />• Businesses should be clustered in developments to allow for the preservation of <br />turning movement capacity. <br />• Use the site plan review process to promote clustering development for <br />maintaining design standards and preserving traffic capacity. <br />• Orient and align buildings and developments with sensitivity to the existing <br />cluster development along the corridor and to establish a sense of design. and <br />• Encourage the design of residential and office park internal traffic circulation to <br />make parking more efficient. <br />Foster attractive mixed-use development in the Planned Office/Institutional" districts <br />around the hospital and in and around Downtown Paris. <br />• Building orientation/setbacks--An increasing number of jurisdictions require <br />primary entrances of buildings to front on the major thoroughfare in an area to <br />avoid haphazard site development patterns. All developments in the corridor <br />should be required to face the local arterial road. Also, special <br />minimum/maximum setback standards should be considered to avoid inconsistent <br />building placement along the corridor. <br />• Parking screening--Limit the impact of parking in front of primary facades by <br />screening and berming to avoid the domination of parking along a main <br />thoroughfare. <br />• Building facade treatment--Standards should be adopted requiring that the facades <br />of all buildings receive some treatment to avoid long expanses of blank walls. <br />Rear/side walls should also have some detailing. <br />• Building materials--To ensure high-quality building materials compatible with a <br />mixed-use development area, the City should consider limiting certain materials, <br />such as corrugated metal facades. <br />• Landscape requirements--Perimeter and parking lot landscaping requirements <br />need to be improved. For example, trees should be required along the front of <br />businesses on arterial roads and in parking lot planting islands. <br />• Signage controls--All signs in the corridor should be ground-mounted monurrient <br />signage limited in size. Off-premise signs (billboards) should not be allowed in <br />the district. Each site with multiple uses should develop a master site plan for <br />review during the site planning process. <br />• Service facilities/loading areas--The City should adopt special standards for <br />placement and screening of trash receptacles, loading areas, and other service <br />facilities. <br />sA98288NwecVtnai rep,rt 2-01.aoc 65 BWR <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.