My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
16-A-1 CAPP Report
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2001-2010
>
2001
>
10 - October
>
October 04, 2001
>
16-A-1 CAPP Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2005 11:20:14 AM
Creation date
10/1/2001 9:08:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGENDA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3. Time pressures will frustrate taking the final CAPP contract back to each <br /> city council for approval. <br /> <br /> The time pressures that are facing CAPP as it attempts to negotiate a contract are <br />evidenced in the following: <br /> <br />Completion of the power supply agreement will be contingent upon <br />commitment of a specific load. General pricing should be known several <br />weeks prior to the completion of a ready to sign contract. Specific city <br />representatives can confirm the economic benefit to their cities assuming <br />aggregation of spec'fflc accounts and be ready to commit a specific load as <br />the contract is nearing completion. <br /> <br />The Public Utility Commission has failed to enter final orders critical to <br />certain elements of future electric pricing and even more critical to <br />quantification of benefits of aggregation. The most important of these is <br />the fuel price component of the price to beat. Orders defining that key <br />pricing component will not be known until the first week of October, at <br />the earliest. Commission delays in issuing orders that influence pricing <br />increase uncertainty among potential providers. That uncertainty indicates <br />to CAPP that it would be prudent to be flexible in timing the finalization <br />of an agreement in order to capture the best possible price and to avoid <br />being adversely impacted by a Commission Order after a contract is <br />signed. Prudent management of this situation necessitates having a <br />specific contact with each member city with whom CAPP can work to <br />confirm economic benefit for each city as circumstances attributable to <br />Commission action and contract negotiations change. <br /> <br />Each retail electric provider or power supplier with whom an end-user <br />deals in the deregulated market place will demand a written contract. <br />From discussions with potential providers, CAPP anticipates that the most <br />efficient mechanism will be for CAPP to negotiate one power supply <br />agreement which will be referred to and adopted by the provider and each <br />city, thus creating a contractual obligation between each city and the <br />provider. Designation of the person who will sign the power supply <br />contract on behalf of each city as soon as possible will enhance the <br />efficiency of CAPP's efforts. <br /> <br /> CAPP recommends that each city designate the same person to both confirm economic <br />benefit and to sign the contract, but a different individual may be designated for each of the two <br />tasks (confirming economic benefit and signing the agreement on behalf of the city) if the City <br />Council desires. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.