Laserfiche WebLink
Regular Council Meetrng <br />July 9, 2001 <br />Page 11 <br />The consensus of the City Council was no, aesthetics was not a concern. <br />10. Should the ordinance limit the kind of lighting that can appear on towers <br />to only that kind of lighting imposed by state or federal law? <br />The City Council was in agreement that the lighting be limited to those <br />imposed by state or federal law. <br />11. Should a limitation be placed on towers in the City of Paris regarding the <br />nature or kind of signage that can appear on towers , with all commercial <br />signage prohibited? <br />The City Council was in agreement that there should be limitation placed on <br />towers. <br />12. Should the City of Paris ordinance require security fencing? <br />The City Council agreed there should be fencing. <br />13. Should the City of Paris require applicants for a permit to reimburse the <br />city for cost incurred in hiring a special consultant for permit applications <br />which involve tower issues that are extremely complex? <br />The City Council agreed that the City of Paris should require reimbursement. <br />14. Should the City of Paris require an application fee to reimburse the city? <br />It was the consensus of the City Council to require an application fee to <br />reimburse the city the cost of administering the ordinance and processing and <br />reviewing applications. <br />15. Is the concept of collocation something that the City of Paris should <br />address? <br />