My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-I Water Production Study
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2001-2010
>
2002
>
05 - May
>
2002-05-13
>
06-I Water Production Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/12/2012 9:54:38 AM
Creation date
4/29/2002 5:08:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGENDA
Item Number
6-I
AGENDA - Type
RESOLUTION
Description
Award Water Prodecution Study - Freese and Nichols, Inc.
AGENDA - Date
5/13/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
C. Why did the Aish-ict Participate in the Program? <br />TheTexasOprimizationProgramiscomp(etelyvoluntary. TheDistrictsawtheprogramas <br />an oppoRunity to assess the treatment planYs capabilityto meetthe proposed more sh-ingent <br />oal <br />enhanced surface water treahnent nile and disinfection by-products regul` S° o id,iumgan <br />of the program is to reduce the risk of waterbom diseases such as Cryp p <br />Giardia. The District felt that by taking this pro-active stance that it would gain valuable <br />insighi into projecting future capital and operahng expenditures to meet the new regularions. <br />The Aistrict also has established a leadership role in the region's water urilities communiry. <br />The District is considered a technical resource by many of the region's water utiliries and <br />is often approached by the rewlatory agencies to pioneer newwater progams. None ofthis <br />activity would be possible without the foresight and support of the DistricYs Boazd of; <br />Directors and admunistrative staff. The District's recognirion ofthe benefits for pro- ~ V va <br />plannulgisan essenrialparttoanysuccessfiilprogramorurilityoperarion. Asalast,y ry <br />significant, point is the plant's operating staff's desire to achieve the very challenging and <br />demanding performance criteria from the Texas Optimizarion Program. Without the <br />commihnent and suppo R of the Board of Directors, the administrative management, the plant <br />operating staff, and regional water utility support this program woutd nothave been possibie. <br />II. BACKGRO'(JND <br />A. Facility Design Features <br />The West W aterTreatment Plant was constructed in 1985 and is rated by theTexas Natural <br />Resource Conservation Commission as a 10 MGD plant. The facilities consistofaterminal <br />storage reservoir for pre-settling, a rapid mic unit for chemical miYing, cwo-stage flocculation <br />with variable speed drive units, sedimentation bazin with tube settlers for enhanced settling, <br />variable decluung rate filters with air assisted backwash, multiple disinfection zones and <br />baffled clearwell for enhanced disinfection contact time. Figure 3 shows the facility layout. <br />Fipure 3: Facility Layout <br /> <br />i i <br />I I <br />~ on -~rt• I <br />~ I <br />I ~ I <br />~ ~ <br />I 1 <br />I i y... ~_..V. ~ <br />I I <br />I <br />-------------J <br />L <br />There are several unique features relating to the design of this faciliry. Figure 4 depicts <br />these features. They include the following: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.