My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-I Water Production Study
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2001-2010
>
2002
>
05 - May
>
2002-05-13
>
06-I Water Production Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/12/2012 9:54:38 AM
Creation date
4/29/2002 5:08:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGENDA
Item Number
6-I
AGENDA - Type
RESOLUTION
Description
Award Water Prodecution Study - Freese and Nichols, Inc.
AGENDA - Date
5/13/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
or automatic effluen[ IIow control valve. At the begirming of the filter run, the filter is <br />clean and has little resistance. If the fiill driving force were applied across the filter, the <br />flow rate would be very high. To maintain a constant flow rate or water level, some of <br />the available driving force is dissipated by a effluent control valve. <br />Variable declining rate filters operate with no individual control rystems except for a flow <br />limiting device (orifice plate). The T'NRCC allows at the beginning of filter run a <br />maximum range for declining rate filters, the maximum filiration rate is 6.5 gpm/sf. The <br />filter dischazge piping is usually designed wich an ori5ce or other permanently installed <br />flow limiting device to ensure that the maximurn filter rate can not be exceeded. <br />In variable declining rate filters, each filter will accept the porcion of the total flow <br />permitted by the common water level above all the filters. The water level above the <br />filters, or head, provides the driving force for the water through the filter media As <br />filtrarion continues, the flow through dirtiest filter will decrease more rapidly than tlvough <br />the other filters, causing the flow to re-distribute itself automatically so that the cleaner <br />filters pick up the capaciry lost by the dirtier filte{s. The water level rises slighNy and the <br />re-distribution of flow to provide the additional head needed by cleaner filters to <br />compensate for the decreased flow through the dirtier filters. The cleanest filter accepts <br />the greatest flow increase and the redistriburion. <br />This method of operation causes a gradually declining rate towazd the end of a filter run. <br />Rate changes throughout the day due to changes in total plant flow, both upward and <br />downwazd, occur gradually and smootkily without any automatic control equipment. The <br />declining rate fillrarion rystems main advantage is the savings in valve and piping <br />arrangements. It is a simpler rystem to operate and allows for greater operating <br />flexibility. Figure 5 illustrates the variable declining rate filter structure. <br />6) Air assisted backwash capabilities provided at the filters. There are three tradi[ionally <br />used backwash methods: <br />• water only backwazh <br />• water and surface or sub-surface wash media scour <br />• water and air scour <br />~ Pigure 5: Declining Rate Filter Structure <br />~ ~ <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.