My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-D Tower Ordinance Amendment
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2001-2010
>
2002
>
08 - August
>
2002-08-08
>
07-D Tower Ordinance Amendment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/12/2012 9:34:05 AM
Creation date
8/5/2002 9:14:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGENDA
Item Number
7-D
AGENDA - Type
ORDINANCE
Description
Amending the Tower Ordinance
AGENDA - Date
8/8/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
above 4 sites. For clarity, the predicted coverage from the Tower was not included. This <br />allows depiction of the void in the coverage without the Tower. The coverage of each <br />sector is shown by different colors. This a"best server" plot where areas shown for <br />~ each sector depict the strongest signal. Thus, any overlap of sector coverage would not <br />be shown. <br />~ Results <br />~ The design of wireless telephone systems, e.g., cellular and PCS, involves controlling <br />the propagation (coverage) of each cell such that a small area (cell) can be covered <br />~ efficiently and, at the same time, minimize interference to other cells utilizing the same <br />frequency groups. Controlling the signal levels at the perimeters of each cell is also very <br />~ important because of the requirement that when a subscriber passes from one cell to <br />another, the call is uninterrupted because of low signal levels. This is called, "hand-off'. <br />~ Because of this, the layout of the cells becomes very location-critical. <br />~ The analysis was conducted considering only the coverage of each sector and did not <br />include capacity, interterence or hand-off analyses. <br />~ In order to maintain the inte9ritY of the desi9n of the s stem, it a <br />Y ppears that the Tower <br />~ should be located within the area shown on the plot (Exhibit TCG-1). This area is <br />approximately 1 mi X.6 mi. There was no effort by TCG to determine whether or not <br />~ there was availability of a tower or property for a tower in this area. <br />19 Conclusion <br />It is the opinion of TCG that because of the critical aspect of the design of the LU <br />~ system, the Tower should be located somewhere within the area depicted on the <br />coverage plot of Exhibit TCG-1. <br />~n ~.1~. <br />4 •e•-;~ y • <br />r , <br />~ Raymond C. Trott, P.E. ••..•.•.••.......i'~i <br />May 10, 2002 ~17MON u.....D.C..TROTT e <br />. ~ ww...u.u.n... <br /> <br />~ 23457 d <br />►a>.j,n,NAL'~'' <br />~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.