Laserfiche WebLink
Even after service has been installed, the City of Pads reports that it is now <br /> impossible to match up accounts with previous year billings. In years past, Pads' <br /> street lighting bill detailed the specific number and type of street lights being billed. <br /> Under deregulation, the City's bill simply states "street lights" with no explanation as <br /> to which lights are being billed. <br /> <br /> · As of December 2002, approximately one-fifth of the City of Duncanville's street <br /> lighting accounts have not been switched. <br /> <br /> · The City of Piano has experienced difficulty in preparing budgets for new City <br /> projects that require street lighting because of Oncor's new street lighting policies. <br /> Instead of a standard street lighting charge like it had prior to deregulation, Oncor <br /> now provides a $1,000 credit for each street light and bills the city for any labor and <br /> equipment costs exceeding the credited mount. Not only has the change made it <br /> difficult for budgeting purposes, it has also resulted in unexpected charges of more <br /> than $10,000 or more per installed light. <br /> <br />Costs to Customers Increase And Will Likely Continue To Climb <br />Under Deregulation. <br /> <br />Why Are Costs Increasing? <br /> <br /> Deregulation in Texas was premised upon the assumption, albeit false, that historically <br />low and stable natural gas prices would continue to result in the generation of low-cost electricity <br />that would become the market price. To a certain extent, the price of natural gas does set the <br />market price of electricity in the deregulated market, but that price has been anything but low <br />and stable during the last two years. Within the last year, the price of natural gas has been three <br />times what it was when SB7 was passed. <br /> <br /> Ironically, much of the increase in the price of natural gas can be attributed to a national <br />trend toward electric deregulation that has stimulated an enormous demand for natural gas as <br />new combustion turbine generators have been planned and constructed. It is a fundamental tenet <br />of economic theory that when demand exceeds supply, prices will rise. As gas prices rise to <br />address the increased demand of new electricity generators, the impact is being felt by Texas <br />customers. <br /> <br /> Everyone is wary of repeating California's failed experiment with competition that <br />brought only high prices and large debts. The Public Utility Commission has undertaken great <br />effort to distinguish Texas' entry into deregulation from California's attempt at deregulation. <br />The Public Utility Commission is correct in its position that California's attempts at deregulation <br />were doomed by its inadequate supplies of electricity. For the time being, Texas is not burdened <br />by this problem, having projected a surplus of generation capacity for the next several years. <br />This means that Texas, unlike California, is unlikely to experience price gouging in the face of a <br />capacity shortage. However, the perceived surplus in capacity may create a different economic <br />perversity that will impact ratepayers' pocketbooks. As the major utilities spin off generation <br /> <br /> 1813\O0~na~uno030113gtng 10 <br /> <br /> <br />