Laserfiche WebLink
Regular Council Meeting <br />December 16, 2013 <br />Page 7 <br />management. Mr. Standifer said they could bring someone in or meet with staff through a <br />remote system. <br />Following presentations, City Council discussed the companies and that each was willing <br />to include local participation. Mayor Hashmi asked for recommendations from staff. Mr. Napier <br />said his initial thought was Neel- Schaffer, but after hearing the presentations he was leaning <br />towards Teague Nall & Perkins. Engineering Technician Justin Oliver said they were all good <br />firms. Public Utilities Director Doug Harris said his evaluation was included in their packets. <br />Mr. Godwin said after hearing the presentations, he recommended Teague Nall & Perkins or <br />Neel- Schaffer. Mayor Hashmi said his first choice was Neel - Schaffer and Cheatham & <br />Associates and his second choice was Huitt - Zollars. Council Members Wright, Jenkins, and <br />Grossnickle favored Neel- Schaffer and Cheatham. Council Member Lancaster favored Neel - <br />Schaffer and Cheatham with Huitt - Zollars as her second selection. Council Member Frierson <br />asked for additional discussion, in that he wanted to look at the associated costs. He asked <br />Shawn Napier for an estimate of the costs and Mr. Napier said roughly 5.5 million dollars but <br />that would depend on the approach. Council Member Frierson inquired if the design would cost <br />over $500,000 and Mr. Napier confirmed that it would. Council Member Frierson said he was <br />concerned about return on investment of this project. Mayor Hashmi said Council previously <br />voted on this item, to which Council Member Frierson acknowledged. Council Member Frierson <br />said Teague Nall & Perkins was his first choice followed by Neel- Schaffer. Council Member <br />Drake said her first choice was Neel- Schaffer followed by Teague Nall & Perkins. <br />A Motion to select and begin contract negotiations with Neel- Schaeffer and Cheatham & <br />Associates with the stipulation of local involvement, and that Council Members Wright and <br />Lancaster be included in the contract negotiations was made by Mayor Hashmi and seconded by <br />Council Member Jenkins. Motion carried, 7 ayes — 0 nays. <br />21. Discuss and act on amendments to the Personnel Policies to include a provision for buy- <br />back of sick leave. <br />HR Manager Sandy Collard explained the personnel policy review committee agreed to <br />consider reinstituting a sick leave sell back policy to encourage less absenteeism and increase <br />morale. Mrs. Collard said the City had such a policy from 1983 until 2004, but this proposed <br />amendment was much more conservative in that the employee must have accumulated at least <br />thirty -five (35) days of unused sick leave as of October 1, and no less than five (5) days up to a <br />maximum of ten (10) days could be sold back at one time. Mrs. Collard also said that an <br />employee who uses more than five (5) days of sick leave during the twelve (12) month <br />immediately prior to October 1 would not be eligible for sell back that year. Mr. Godwin <br />estimated the cost of the policy this year to be $117,500. Council Member Drake asked if they <br />would know the exact cost during the budget process and Mr. Godwin answered in the <br />affirmative. <br />