My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
17-A Benefits Sub(12-08-03)
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2001-2010
>
2004
>
01 - January
>
2004-01-12
>
17-A Benefits Sub(12-08-03)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/11/2012 4:35:24 PM
Creation date
1/9/2004 10:23:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGENDA
Item Number
17-A
AGENDA - Type
MINUTES
Description
City Council Benefits Subcommittee
AGENDA - Date
12/8/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Paris Council Benefits Subcommittee <br />December 8, 2003 <br />Page 2 <br />there after. <br />Councilman Bell said for city employees other than civil service, they can have <br />an unlimited accrued vacation. Mr. Anderson said that was correct. Councilman <br />Bell asked if that could put the city in a very precarious position if an employee <br />were to retire or leave the employment of the city. Mr. Anderson said if they <br />leave with a large accumulation of vacation time and has less than 10 years with <br />the city, they can only be paid for 20 days of that vacation. If they have 10 years <br />or more they can be paid for 30 days of vacation and if they have more than 30 <br />days they lose it. Mr. Bell asked if a person comes in and advises that they were <br />retiring and they have 4 months remaining vacation and they want to take 4 <br />months of it, and then retire in 4 months what happens. Mr. Anderson said that <br />any vacation leave taken has to be approved by the department head. He said <br />that if it was someone in my department he would not allow them to do that <br />because he could not do without an employee for 4 months. Councilman Bell <br />pointed out that there is nothing in the policy to prevent it. Councilman Bell said <br />if he could accumulate all of the vacation days he wanted, and he accumulated <br />two or three years' worth, then he decides to sell it back, and he is going to sell <br />it back at 75% of the rate of pay he had on September 15 of which year and has <br />had three pay raises. Would you go back to year one and calculate it based on <br />the actual vacation, or does he get to sell it back to the city at the new pay rate. <br />Mr. Anderson advised that it would be sold back at 75% of the pay raise of the <br />previous budget year. Mr. Anderson advised that there is not going to be a case <br />in your illustration where a year that someone has received more than a 25% pay <br />raise. He told Councilman Bell that he had never seen anyone sell it back at a <br />rate higher than what they earned it at because of the discount. Mr. Anderson <br />said that was the purpose of the discount is to off-set that. Councilman Bell <br />asked if it was normal for an industry to have a cap on the amount of vacation <br />that can be accrued and a use it or lose it theory. Mr. Anderson advised said he <br />did not know about industry, but it varies from city to city. <br />Councilman Bell stated that he felt there should be a limit on how much vacation <br />time someone can accrue. He said it does not have to be something that would <br />be accumulated at one and one-half days a month. Mr. Anderson advised that <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.