Laserfiche WebLink
RECENT EXPERI ENCE <br />VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENTS AND EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLANS <br />FREESE AND <br />NICHOLS: <br />HELPING YOC! <br />PROTECT YOUR <br />WATER SUPPLY <br />Innovative approaches . . <br />nommis <br />crNS* w Ntehou <br />practical results <br />Prepared for the Brown County Water Improvement District #1, the Cities of <br />Abilene, Beaumont, Carrollton, Denton, Corpus Christi, <br />Garland, Irving, Midlothian, North Richland Hills, Plano, <br />San Angelo and Temple. <br />////wl~~ <br />Following the events of September 11, 2001, the EPA CITY OF <br />~ received supplemental appropriations to improve the ABILENE <br />safety and security of the nation's water supply. The <br />supplemental appropriation was intended to reduce the ~ <br />vulnerability of water systems to terrorist attacks and to <br />enhance their security and ability to respond to ~ z. <br />emergency situations. In support of that goal, the EPA <br />provided grant funds to large water systems that serve 100,000 or <br />more people. The grant program funds could be used for <br />development of a VA, development of an ERP, and planning and <br />design of security enhancements. The grant program required CARRCXLTOr, <br />large water systems to complete the VA by December 31, 2002. <br />When funding became available, FNI notified the Cities of d~ <br />Abilene, Beaumont, Carrollton, Garland and Plano and prepared <br />the grant applications. Each grant was submitted to the EPA and - <br />approved for the full award amount of $115,000. ~ <br />FNI prepared a VA and a new ERP for each client. The VAs were <br />completed within three months and certification of completion <br />submitted to the EPA by the EPA-mandated deadline of December <br />31, 2003. Gt"D <br />One of the challenges of assessing vulnerabilities of a large utility <br />system is the geographic extent, i.e. multiple facilities such as <br />~ <br />~ <br />reservoirs, intakes, treatment plants, pump stations, storage <br />facilities and miles of transmission and distribution lines. Using <br />I Itv► N C, <br />the RAM-W methodology, FNI determined risk by evaluating the <br />system's effectiveness against an adversary. Performing this risk <br />_,Cty w <br />ltitI6 <br />analysis for the water system yielded a list that was rank-ordered <br />a~ <br />'~dlo <br />by the relative level of risk. <br />41 P,08mi,e twn' <br />This allows the utility system to reduce the highest risks first and <br />focus limited resources in those areas. FNI provided not only NRH <br />recommendations for physical improvements but also operational <br />and procedural changes. Construction cost estimates and a <br />phased implementation plan was provided for planning purposes. /The water utiliry Emergency Operations Plan included procedures 1-10-11 <br />to not only respond to various levels of terrorist threat in response <br />to the National Homeland Security Advisory System Threat ow <br />Conditions, but also specific incident response plans. The plan will be used as a stand-alone document for water utility department training and "meshes" with the water system's <br />citywide emergency response plan. uu~ <br />6.11.6nige g.~ <br />~ <br /> <br />Vulnerability Assessment and Emergency Response Plan SOQ page 10 <br />