Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Lisa to explain the project to the Commission. He related that the on1y minor change in thc <br />original plans subnÜtted was to allow Coca Cola access. After a brief discussion period with <br />qucstions by the Chairman and Barbara Wilson, a motion was made by Sue Lancaster and <br />seconded by Becki Normcnt. The motion carried unarumously. <br /> <br />Item 4 <br />Discussion of and possible action regarding the following structure considered by code <br />inspectors to be in violation of Article III of Chapter 7 of the "Code on Ordinances of the <br />City of Paris, Texas. <br />Building A: 438 1 st StreciliJ.l. . After some discussion on the wording ofthc motion, Barbara <br />Wilson offered the motion that the structurc has no historical significance and can be razed. <br />Building B.: ~S1....N..E. A motion by Becki Norment stated that this propcrty has no <br />historical sigruficance . The motion was seconded by Sue Lancaster. The motion carried <br />unanimously <br />Building C: 758 1 st St N.E... Paul Denny urged that this property be opened for discussion. It <br />was stated that this property had historical significance as an example of a shotgun house. He <br />further stated that the Lamar County Historical Society has shown an interest in this house and <br />had funds to move the house. He then made a motion to pull the property ITom thc list. The <br />motion was seconded by Claudia Hunt. Thc motion carried unanimously <br />Building D: 3..40-348 2nd Strcct N E Paul Denny madc a motion that the building was not <br />historÌcally significant and the motion was seconded by Jerry Raper. The motion carried <br />unanimously. <br />Building E. 21Qli_J'xmline. The building was not deemed historically significant and could not be <br />rehabilitated. The motion was de by Suc Lancaster and seconded by Claudia Hunt. After a voice <br />vote, the motion carried unanimously. <br />Building F. :118 3rd St N.E. The building was not deemed historically significant and could not be <br />rehabilitated. The motion was made by Ann Rogers and seconded by Suc Lancaster. A!lcr a voice <br />votc, thc motion carried unanimously. <br />Building G. un W Austin S1re.e1 The building was not deemed historically significant and could <br />not be rehabilitated. The motion was made by Barbara Wilson and seconded by Bccki Norment. <br />After a voicc vote, the motion carried unanimously. <br />Building H. 350 3rd St N E The building was not deemed historically significant and could not <br />be rchabilitated. The motion was made by Paul Denny and seconded by Barbara Wilson. After a <br />voice vote, tbe motion carried unanimously. <br />Building I S:29 6th St NW . The building was not deemed historically sigrùficant and could not <br />be rehabilitated. The motion was made by Barbara Wilson and seconded by Becki Normcnt. After <br />a voice vote, the motion carried unanimously. <br />Building J. 635 6th St N.W. The building was not decmed historically significant and could not <br />be rehabilitated. The motion was made by Becki Norment and seconded by Jerry Raper. Afler a <br />voicc votc, the motion carried unanimously. <br />Building K. JilliJ:ith..~ The building was not deemed historically significant and could not <br />be rehabilitatcd. The motion was made by Barbara Wilson and secondcd by Becki Normcnt. After <br />a voice vote, the motion carried unanimously. <br />Building L. 649 W Shcrman St. Paul Denny asked to be recused from discussion and voting on <br />