Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Location: Location adjustments tend to be somewhat subjective, as location differences are often difficult <br />to isolate. Differences in location often will indicate that the highest and best use of the tracts are different. This is <br />due to the tendency of a particular highest and best use to be predominant in areas with similar location <br />characteristics. In this case, all of the tracts are considered to have a similar highest and best use and are relatively <br />similar in location. <br /> <br />Size/Shape: The sizes and shape of the various com parables is considered to have some impact upon sale <br />price. The sales used in this report are not all the same size and size adjustments were necessary. When <br />appropriate, adjustments will be made for differences in shape, as well. <br /> <br />Sale 1 occurred in September of 2003 and involved a 0.27 acre tract of land located at 3171 Lamar A venue. <br />The grantor in this transaction was Billy J. Williams and the grantee was Stephen Brown. Consideration involved in <br />this sale was $45,000 or $3.83 per square foot. When comparing this sale to the subject property, no adjustments <br />were deemed necessary. In the absence of any adjustments, Sale 1 indicates a per unit value of $3.83 per square <br />foot. <br /> <br />Sale 2 occurred in July of 2003 and involved a 0.198 acre tract of hmd located at 2404 Lamar Avenue. The <br />grantor in the transaction was David Glass Investments, LLC and the grantee was Larry Whitener and wife, Misty <br />Whitener. Consideration involved in this sale was $35,000 or $4.06 per square foot. When comparing this sale to <br />the subject property, a downward adjustment was made to account for the subject's inferior access/frontage. After <br />this adjustment, Sale 2 indicates a per unit value for the subject property of $3.65 per square foot. <br /> <br />Sale 3 is the May of 2002 sale of a 1.19 acre tract located along the south line of Lamar Avenue, east of <br />Collegiate. The grantor in this transaction was Hibernia National Bank and the grantee was Tony Bowden and Stacy <br />Bowden. Consideration involved in this sale was $100,000 which equates to a per square foot sales price of $1.93. <br />When comparing this sale to the subject property, an upward adjustment was made to account for the subject's <br />smaller size. After this adjustment, Sale 3 indicates a per unit value for the subject property of $2.03 per square <br />foot. <br /> <br />The fmal sale used in this analysis occurred in November of 2001 and involved a 2.0716 acre tract of land <br />located at 3890 Lamar Avenue. The grantor in this transaction was James Christopher Martin and the grantee was <br />Ting's CoIporation. Consideration involved in this sale was $300,000 which equates to a per unit sales price of <br />$3.32 per square foot. When comparing the sale to the subject property, a positive adjustment was made to account <br />for the subject property's smaller size. Additionally, a negative adjustment was made to account for the subject's <br />inferior location when compared to Sale 4. After these adjustments, Sale 4 indicates a per unit value for the subject <br />property of $3.32 per square foot. <br /> <br />In summarizing the adjustment process for the subject property, the unit sale prices of the comparables <br />utilized ranged from $1.93 to $4.06 per square foot before adjustments. After applying the adjustments noted, the <br />sales produce adjusted sale prices that range from $2.03 to $3.83 per square foot. Considering the sinúlarities and <br />differences of these sales as they compare to the subject, it is my opinion that the subject property (land only) has a <br />market value, as of the date of this appraisal, of$3.50 per square foot. <br /> <br />Page 4.1 <br />