My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/15/2014 MINUTES
City-of-Paris
>
Boards and Commissions
>
PEDC
>
1993-2016
>
2014
>
09/15/2014 MINUTES
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/31/2015 11:56:06 AM
Creation date
10/16/2014 2:11:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Council/PEDC Meeting <br />September 15, 2014 <br />Page 6 <br />Moore said it depended on what she was talking about and Council Member Lancaster <br />referenced property and monies. Mr. Moore said he could not address how that should be <br />disposed. Council Member Lancaster wanted to know if it would go back to the PEDC or the <br />City and Mr. Moore inquired if PEDC had a lien. Council Member Lancaster said it was <br />purchased by the tax payer money. Mr. Moore said if there was a lien, they could get repayment. <br />Council Member Lancaster also asked about the existing monies in the bank accounts. Mr. <br />Moore said a lawsuit could be filed to potentially recover monies that were owed under a <br />contract. Council Member Lancaster reminded Mr. Moore there was no contract. Mr. Wilson <br />asked if the contract was signed, to which Council Member Lancaster replied no. Mr. Wilson <br />asked about a remedy for an unsigned contract and how much money was expended. Mr. Moore <br />explained there may be some applicable arguments or detrimental reliance arguments that could <br />be raised if they had a contract. He said they were getting into equitable issues to raise, but <br />obviously it was better to have a signed contract. Mr. Wilson again asked how much money was <br />given to R3BI and wanted to know what it was used for. Council Member Lancaster told Mr. <br />Wilson it was used for everything, such as Hank Betke's salary although he was a contract <br />employee of PEDC. She said it was used for bail -outs and most of the first year it looked like it <br />was just feathering their nest. Mr. Moore reiterated they need to have written contracts. Council <br />Member Lancaster said absolutely and because there was no written contract, there was no <br />oversight. She said this was a severe waste of tax payer monies. Mr. Brockman inquired if the <br />monies were approved by the Board and the City Council and Council Member Lancaster said <br />they were not approved by the Board. <br />Mrs. Clifford asked if she could answer that question. Mrs. Clifford reported that over the three <br />(3) year period approximately $400,000 was given to R3BI. She said part of that was put into a <br />line item on the budget for a certain amount, but a lot of it was in excess of what they paid in <br />advertisement for the grand opening, and used for just about anything. Mrs. Clifford explained <br />from the accounting part if you look at the line item budget for that account, you would see there <br />were other expenses placed in that account line item budget. She further explained if you go <br />through and look at R3BI and review the exact line item, there were much more throughout the <br />budget. She also said some expenses may be under new industry, it may be under existing <br />industry, it may be under global recruiting, rural innovations, just anywhere they needed to stick <br />the money. Mrs. Clifford said if you look back through it, you could say those were fraudulent, <br />because it wasn't the line item those expenses should have been put in. Mrs. Clifford told Mr. <br />Moore that was one way of looking at it and referenced attended the training he conducted in <br />2013. Mrs. Clifford said at that time she asked the question, could you give money to another <br />organization and Mr. Moore's answer was No. She said she guessed that was what he was <br />saying now too. Mrs. Clifford brought up the AG Opinion that he talked during that training <br />regarding that the City of Pampa could not give money to the Junior College. Mrs. Clifford <br />wanted to know what would happen if Pampa would have just gone and done it. Mr. Moore said <br />if they would have done it, the Attorney General would have told them they need a written <br />contract because you cannot gift public monies, and that there needs to be a written contract. He <br />also said at the same time there was not a criminal provision. Mrs. Clifford inquired why you <br />even need an Attorney General Opinion as you could just do what you wanted to do, which is <br />kind of what PEDC did. Mr. Moore said well, no. He said they had a political issue and the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.