My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/16/1986
City-of-Paris
>
Boards and Commissions
>
OTHER
>
STREET COMMITTEE
>
10/16/1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/9/2015 3:29:19 PM
Creation date
1/30/2015 9:18:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
stormwater projects. Each project <br />can be QxQmined and compared with <br />other stormwater projects according <br />to a set of parameters. The immediacy <br />of each project is evaluated along with <br />engineering and economic considera- <br />tions, characteristics of the problem, <br />public sensitivity to the problem, and <br />upstream and downstream benefits <br />from correcting the problem. This <br />method, being developed jointly by <br />the stormwater management staff in <br />cooperation with WEGA. Inc., local <br />engineering management consult- <br />ants. allows projects to be judged <br />fairly and gives the public works de- <br />partment and city council recom- <br />mendations for improvements on a <br />"worst- first" basis. <br />Because we proposed a modest <br />budget of $5 million a year for <br />stormwater management. the plan <br />was accepted as a way to begin coping <br />with Cincinnati's stormwater drain- <br />age needs. If a group of frustrated <br />public works officials had begged for <br />$50 million to solve all of the city's <br />drainage problems, this measure cer- <br />tainly would have been defeated. <br />However, by presenting the city gov- <br />ernment and the citizens with a logi- <br />cal, thought -out approach, we gener- <br />ate a certain goo d faith and positive <br />response that turned the concept into <br />reality.- LJLF1 <br />4. Lessons to be Learned <br />You need a storm. Nothing was more helpful for stimulating public <br />interest in the stormwater problem than the two 100 -year storms that <br />Cincinnati experienced in 1982. If there is nothing to stimulate public <br />interest, support for the program will likely be difficult to achieve. <br />Positive attitudes help push the program. Because the idea of a <br />stormwater management utility was innovative, there were those who <br />said it would never work. The engineer or manager that directs a study <br />on stormwater management needs a positive attitude to combat people <br />who will give a whole list of reasons why something cannot be done. <br />Buy a pair of sharp scissors. This is vital for cutting through the <br />infamous amount of red tape that exists in a municipal government. You <br />must proceed when there are problems, sell, and then resell your plan. <br />Inertia is the greatest force in government. <br />Doing homework paves the road to success. You must document the <br />problem. Information collected must be accurate and given justification. <br />It is not enough to say there is a problem. Proper documentation also is <br />vital when selling the program to the public. <br />Involve as many people as possible in the process. Within your own <br />organization and among the public, make people aware of the problem. <br />The thought of visiting 48 community councils and trying to sell them on a <br />$50 million program may indeed be frightening, but it could make the <br />difference between a plan and an implemented program. <br />Do not create another bureaucracy. Citizens do not want more gov- <br />ernment, just efficient service. We chose to think small organizationally <br />— 15 to 20 people. Supplement existing stormwater management staff <br />with existing city maintenance organizations and contract for needed <br />design, construction, and additional maintenance services. <br />156 For details circle No. A -125 on card PUBLIC WORKS for September, 1986 <br />Hydropower Catch Basin Cleaner <br />•- Designed to vacuum clean catch • Tank is hydraulically raised and <br />basins. digesters, deep wet wells, lowered for dumping <br />sludge beds, etc. <br />hose <br />•Vacuum reel and operator <br />• One man operation controls are located on curb side <br />inches ft. <br />• Delivers up to 380 of • Operates at depths to 35 <br />water in vacuum (28 Hg.) . Vacuums up to 100 ft. away <br />. Recovers material under water from unit <br />i . Available with 1200 gallon . Recovers wet or dry material <br />(6 cu. yd.) or 2000 gallon <br />(10 cu. yd.) collector tank <br />CLEANER CHOICE <br />Hydropower Sewer & Catch Basin Cleaner <br />• Combination machine designed . Tank tailgate is liquid tight <br />to clean sewers and catch basins - Sewer hose reel (600 ft. capacity) <br />- <br />t3 One man operation is mounted behind truck cab <br />`y <br />/ �! • Triplex pump cleans sewers • All operator controls are located <br />S with 2000 PSI water pressure on curb side <br />• Vacuum system removes debris . Vacuum power of 380 inches of <br />from catch basin or manhole water (28 Hg.) <br />• Available with 1200 gallon • Fully operational in cold climates <br />(6 cu. yd.) or 2000 gallon <br />(10 cu. yd.) collector tank <br />See The All New HYDROPOWER LOADER MANUFACTURING COMPANY <br />at Booth 500 APWA Show 3275 E. CENTRAL/ P.O. 80X341 / FRESNO, CA 93708 /PHONE(209) 268.8521 <br />156 For details circle No. A -125 on card PUBLIC WORKS for September, 1986 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.