Laserfiche WebLink
February 25, 1974 <br />Ms. Gail H. Carstens <br />Branch Librarian <br />Kashmere Gardens Branch <br />5411 Pardee <br />Houston, Texas 77026 <br />Dear Ms. Carstens: <br />i am answering your letter for Mr. Medley concerning the "no fine" policy. <br />We began this policy on November 1, 1970. A six months trial period was made <br />to see if the amount of overdue books would increase significantly. The trial period proved <br />to be a success and after the six months, the "no fine" system was put into effect. The <br />staff and patrons alike have been more than pleased with the success of this system. <br />fines: Now to the essential facts. First, we looked at the traditional reasons for having <br />1. To encourage the prompt return of materials. <br />2. Income for the library (really the City). <br />3. To punish law breakers (Yes, this is really a reason in the minds of some <br />librarians and many city officials). <br />Second, we asked ourselves If these reasons were really valid and /or effective: <br />I. Statistics show (see below) that a large percentage of overdue books come <br />in shortly after the first notice is sent. By the time that the second notice <br />is sent, only a small percentage of books remain out. These are your real <br />violators and problems. <br />2. We, and most public libraries do not get to keep fines anyway. Cities will <br />argue that even though this is true, the fines are taken into consideration <br />at budget time. Don't believe it. Anyway, are public libraries in business <br />to generate revenues? <br />3. Punishment • no comment. <br />After giving these things a lot of thought and laying a lot of groundwork with the Library <br />Board, Mr. Medley made the decision to move ahead. He has never regretted that decision. <br />-Below are somestatistics that were done right before and after the policy began. <br />