1973-1979 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• r ? Y The tracts were considered individually as follows: Tract No. 1: Change from a C (Commercial District) to an A (Agricultural District) part of Lots 8, 9 and 10, City Block 188 -E located on the south side of (New Jefferson Road) F.M. Highway•No. 1507, east of Sixth S.E. Mr. Hardy Moore, representing Michel T. Halbouty, spoke in favor of the change. No one else was present to comment on Tract No. 1. Discussion followed and Dr. Miles moved that Tract No. 1 be recommended for approval.' Mr. Fuller seconded the motion and all voted aye.. Tract No. 2: Change from a C (Commercial District)to a SF -2 (One Family Dwelling District), Lots 1, 2, 39 49 5 -A, 6, 6 -A, 60 and part of Lot 7, City Block 186 -E, located between Old Jefferson Road and New Jefferson Road east of Evergreen Street. Mr. Moore again spoke in favor for Mr. Halbouty. There were no other comments concerning Tract No. 2 and following discussion Mr. Adkins moved that it be recommended for approval. Mr. Thornton seconded the motion and all voted aye. Dr. Gilmore left the meeting at this paint. Tract No. 3: Change from a C (Commercial District) to a SF -2 (One Family Dwelling District) Lots 1 through 8, City Block 188 -C, Lots 2, 3, 3A, 4, 5, 5A, 5G and 5C, City Block 188 -D located between Sixth S.E. and Twelfth S.E., north of .Old Jefferson Road. Mr. Raymond Pomroy, 601 Jefferson Road, stated that he has operated a business on the northeast corner of Sixth Street and Jefferson Road for about 18 years on Lot 1, Block 188 -C and he wanted that property to remain zoned Commercial. He said he also owned Lot 2, Block 188 -C but had no plans to develop it commercially. Mr. Paul W.-Horne, 795 Jefferson Road, owner of Lot 8, Block 188 -C, stated that he manufactured fish bait, built custom fishing rods and operated an electrical contracting business out of his house. He requested that his lot remain zoned Commercial as he had plans to construct a small building behind his house for business purposes. Mr. Moore, again speaking for Mr. Halbouty, stated no opposition to Mr. Pomroy's propeet y remaining Commercial, but objected to Mr. Horne's request on the grounds that if it remained Commercial, it would affect single family development. Mr. Arch Hatch stated no objection to zoning his property SF -2. M. J. Stewart and Juan Rhodes stated a preference for SF -2 zoning on their properties. Discussion followed and Mr. Thornton moved that Tract 3, except for Lot 1, Block 188 -C, be recommended for approval and that Mr. Horne's property, Lot 8, Block 188 -C, be recorded as a non - conforming use with all the rights provided by the Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Fuller seconded the emotion and all voted aye.