1988 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Lawrence Wade, 3330 E.__Houston, stated a fence along the west property line would be desireable from his point of view. Mr. Hutchison spoke in rebuttal saying that the drainage will be checked prior to Thursdays Council meeting. He said it would not be fair to require fencing along the east and west property lines since the adjacent lots have the same zoning classification as theirs. No one else spoke and the public hearing was closed. Following discussion, Mr. Davidson made a motion to recommend approval of the Site Plan as submitted subject to the exceptions listed in City Engineer's Memorandum dated February 26, 1988, marked Exhibit A and attached hereto. Mr. Hildreth seconded the motion which carried 6 ayes, 0 nays. Chairman Nutt declared the public hearing open on the petition of Sid Hollings- worth for Site Plan approval in a Planned Development - Retail District (PD -a) on Lot 11, City Block 296, located at 3235 Lamar Avenue. Ray Ellis was present to represent the application. He told the Commission that • lube center was proposed for the tract and that he was in agreement to install • 6-foot wood fence along the rear property line and to install a fire hydrant on the south side of Lamar Avenue since there was none within 150 feet of their property. He also stated he wanted to adjust the driveway location to protect the 18" Magnolia Tree on the front property line. No one else was present to speak on the matter and the public hearing was closed. Mr. McCollum advised the Commission that the necessary green area and landscape plan was not shown on the Site Plan submitted. He recommended approval subject to : 1. Compliance with Tree Ordinance requirements; 2. Installation of fire ilydrant; 3. Installation of a 6 foot wood fence along the rear property line. A motion was made by Mr. Perry, seconded by Mr. Hildreth to recommend approval subject to the three items being put on the Site Plan. The motion carried 6 ayes, 0 nays. Chairman Nutt declared the public hearing open on the petition of John David Griffith for Site Plan approval in a Planned Development- Retail District (PD -a) on Lot 18, City Block 296 located at 3365 Lamar Avenue. Mr. McCollum read a letter from Mr. Griffith requesting the petition be tabled until the April meeting. Steve Elkins, 3380 E. Houston, advised the Commission that he owned the property and Mr. Griffith did not have an option or contract to purchace it. Mr. Haynes ruled that the Griffith application was invalid since he held no option or contract and advised that no action was necessary and the petition is automatically dropped from consideration. The Replat of Part of Lots 2 and 3, City Block 313 was recommended for approval on a motion by Mr. Perry, seconded by Mr. Hildreth, subject to the exceptions listed in City Engineer's Memorandum dated March 7, 1988 marked Exhibit B and attached hereto. The motion carried 6 ayes, 0 nays. There being no further business to consider, the meeting was adjourned. n� e N. McCollum Secretary Ex- Officio