My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1994
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2015 1:58:29 PM
Creation date
9/2/2015 9:48:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1051
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
791 <br />600 cubic feet of water usage will increase from about $11.29 to $12.55 <br />per month or about $1.26 per month, and commercial customers using <br />25,000 cubic feet of water will experience a bill increase from $329.65 <br />to $378.81 per month. The total revenue requirement of the Wastewater <br />Utility portion for the test year is estimated to be $3,588,945.00. <br />The residential wastewater billing units needs to be changed from the <br />average winter water usage to 80% of each month's water consumption in <br />order to provide revenue stability. Such method is commonly accepted <br />in the rate making industry. The non - metered commercial and industrial <br />wastewater customers should be billed at 100% of their monthly water <br />usage. Analysis of monthly commercial and industrial water consumption <br />shows little seasonal fluctuation which indicates that virtually all of <br />the water is returned to the wastewater system on a year -round basis. <br />Under the proposed rate structure, the wastewater rates of the average <br />residential customer with 400 cubic feet of wastewater contribution <br />will increase from about $9.99 to $12.86 per month or about $2.87 per <br />month. Commercial customers with 25,000 cubic feet of flow will <br />experience rate increase from $514.60 to $606.45 per month. The rate <br />increases from industrial customers will vary from customer to customer <br />because of surcharges built into the rate structure for wastewater of <br />higher strength than the domestic wastewater. The combined water and <br />wastewater monthly charge for the average residential customer will <br />increase from $21.28 to $25.41 or an increase of about four dollars <br />under the consultant recommended rates. The increase in the water and <br />sewer rates is due primarily to increased debt service as well as other <br />cost increases since the last rate study. Debt service has increased <br />by 17.3% since the last study, and total budgeted sewer. costs have <br />increased by 24.5 %. It should be noted that the increased debt service <br />is due to the funding of mandatory improvements required by federal and <br />state agencies. Operations and maintenance expenses are significantly <br />impacted by TU Electric's 15% rate increase. Based upon our <br />observations, the City staff exercised good management over those <br />remaining activities and costs which are within its control. <br />Dan Smith, 905 Wilburn, came forward stating that he: was in Jim's <br />District, and was present to speak on behalf of himself as a resident, <br />and also as a commercial customer. Mr. Smith said as a citizen he has <br />had the opportunity to live in a great number of places, and his water <br />bill in Paris is the highest that he as experienced. Until now it is <br />the first time he has heard about the rate increase, or what the <br />proposed rates were. As a commercial customer, Mr Smith said after <br />hearing about this today, he did some checking, and through that his <br />rate increase at Kimberly Clark will increase 53% and the implemental <br />rate is scheduled to go up 41 %, and had heard thing as high on <br />residential to 30 %. Mr. Smith said that to propose this sort of <br />increase without talking to someone first, or to expect a commercial <br />customer to sit back and think this is the adequate way to gain revenue <br />without discussing any of these issues is not the correct way to go <br />about trying to increase rates particularly 50 %. Mr. Smith said this <br />would impact Kimberly -Clark about $120,000.00 over a year's time which <br />is something that they did not have budgeted. Mr. Smith said he <br />believed that part of the increase was done on a TU Electric rate <br />increase of 15% projection, and if he was not mistaken, the increase of <br />TU Electric was going to be in the neighborhood of 8 %, so to suggest <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.