Laserfiche WebLink
1i U <br />In addition, a very limited number of capital items will be purchased through the City's internal <br />equipment replacement loan fund on a three -year term at three percent interest (to recapitalize <br />the fund). Specifically: <br />1. EMS — $120,000 for annual fleet replacement program of one ambulance. <br />2. Fire Department — $70,000 to replace the existing and non - compliant personal alert <br />safety system (PASS) and $24,200 to replace rescue tools (e.g. "jaws of life ") that are old <br />enough that replacement parts are increasingly more difficult and expensive to acquire. <br />The old PASS system is still functional but no longer meets NFPA standards and will be <br />transferred to Public Works for their use in confined space and other hazardous work <br />areas. The new rescue tools will be placed on the engines instead of the rescue buck, <br />allowing the rescue truck to remain in the station instead of responding with an engine <br />and thereby reducing maintenance and operation expenses for the rescue truck. <br />3. Police Department — $53,116 for two patrol cars (reducing its annual fleet replacement <br />program from four patrol cars to two). <br />Conclusion <br />The desire of City Councils to maintain the lowest ad valorem tax rate as possible is <br />understandable, particularly given the overall economic climate. It is also important for <br />economic development purposes to have a tax rate that is competitive with other communities. <br />However, creating an artificially low tax rate by deferring maintenance and/or planning for <br />known future expenses is not successful in the long -term and usually creates a more painful <br />fiscal environment for the future. The proposed $0.5200 tax rate will be the third consecutive <br />year the rate has remained the same and is the result of a $0.17 rate drop from FY 2005 -2006 to <br />FY 2008 -2009 and is a 2.3 percent decrease in the effective rate (the rate that brings in the same <br />amount of dollars as the previous year). <br />There are several looming fiscal issues that must eventually be addressed. First, in addition to <br />several million dollars of street, sidewalk, and drainage projects there are also a couple of million <br />dollars worth of fire trucks that will be reaching the end of their service lives and credit for ISO <br />rating (this will happen at about the same time because the City found itself in a similar situation <br />in 1996 and had to purchase several trucks all at once). Another $243 million is needed in <br />rehabilitation/renovation of city facilities, City Hall being a primary one. <br />Second, the City's water and wastewater infrastructure (including distribution, collection, and <br />treatment) needs tens of millions of dollars in rehabilitation and improvements. For example, the <br />wastewater treatment plant master plan alone calls for $35-40 million to replace the existing <br />plant. Over the last few years, using results from the annual water and wastewater rate study, the <br />Council has been adjusting rates to make the wastewater system self - sufficient and begin <br />establishing healthy reserves for both systems. Nonetheless, the new wastewater treatment plant <br />and repair and replacement of other deteriorating water and wastewater infrastructure present a <br />significant challenge to the rate structure. <br />