Laserfiche WebLink
Kent McIlyar asked does the board have any questions for Mr. Efrussy. No response. <br />Jerry Haning stated Mr. Walker, this is a very unusual request. He sat on this board for two <br />and a half years, and we've had pretty simple cases. Most things we deal with contractors <br />on five -foot variances. Mr. Haning stated he doesn't want to make a decision on this <br />because he doesn't believe it's this boards place. If the board doesn't make a decision on <br />this, it will just be tabled and no vote will take place. <br />Kent McIlyar stated the board has two issues before them. The board has 2.a., which is the <br />appeal of the building official's decision revoking the building permit for Lot 2, Block B of <br />Morningside North 2 Subdivision, at 4250 Lamar Avenue. The board needs to vote on this <br />issue. The board also needs a motion and a vote on the Glick's application for a variance <br />under 2.b. in your agenda. Both of these actions under City Zoning Ordinance Section 16, it <br />states that the concurring vote of four members of the Board of Adjustments shall be <br />necessary to revise any administrative official, or to decide in favor of the applicant on any <br />matter upon which it is required to pass under this ordinance or to effect any variance in <br />said ordinance. So both items need separate motions and votes. <br />Steve Walker stated Mr. Haning, just to speak on that, he says on behalf of my client, we do <br />need a decision, because a non - decision or a tabling leaves my client in further limbo. He <br />doesn't know if the board is aware, but this has been months just to get here because there <br />were issues with new board members and some being out of town. We're now six months <br />past the time the building permit stopped, and so we do need a decision. Obviously we've <br />asked the board to decide to grant the appeal. If you choose not to grant the appeal, then <br />that at least clears the way for my client to take legal action that he needs to do in order to <br />protect his business interest and to recover losses that he's experienced because of this <br />process. Mr. Walker further stated he will say that we do not want there to not be a decision <br />today, because otherwise, we can't move forward either way. <br />Jerry Haning stated okay. <br />Louise Hagood stated Mr. Chairman (Jerry Haning), on 2.a., we haven't heard Mr. Glick <br />and she would like to ask him a question. <br />Jerry Haning stated go right ahead. <br />Louise Hagood asked the appeal of the decision revoking the permit, it talks about your <br />hardships. Tell me what your hardships have been other than the delay of time? <br />Ben Glick stated we incurred a great expense with our general contractor, the design and <br />the dirt work. Then we've hired employees, or specifically a manager, who we were <br />training, hoping to open up the facility some time ago here in Paris. We do feel obligated <br />not to let that employee go because of events outside of his control, so we continue to have <br />him on our payroll. Mostly design and development cost of the business. <br />