My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/16/2015
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2021
>
2015
>
11/16/2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2015 3:08:42 PM
Creation date
12/16/2015 3:08:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular Council Meeting <br />November 16, 2015 <br />Page 12 <br />did not get a property response so the Council asked that the entire contract be cancelled, a new <br />tax statement be sent to the Harpers and abated taxes be returned to the City. Mayor Hashmi <br />said he appreciated all of Council Member Clifford's hard work. Council Member Clifford <br />asked that item 20 remain open should Council want to take any action after hearing from the <br />Harpers. <br />Mayor Hashmi asked if it was acceptable to combine items 20 and 21. A Motion to <br />combine items 20 and 21 was made by Mayor Hashmi and seconded by Council Member Pickle. <br />Motion carried, 7 ayes — 0 nays. <br />21. Discussion from Harrison, Walker and Harper regarding Paris Warehouse 107 tax <br />abatement agreement(s). <br />Jordan Harper with Harrison, Walker and Harper introduced himself. He said the <br />purpose of coming to the meeting was actually to give factual information on what happened <br />with the 2006 tax abatement. He also said he was there to respectfully request that certain elected <br />officials and appointed officials stop their questionable and harmful behavior and he hoped they <br />could move forward as a community. He said there seemed to be a lot of personal agendas and <br />political agendas and that was not really adding value to the community. He explained this was <br />the 2006 proposed expansion and that Council Member Clifford was right, as they never <br />constructed the building. He explained they had a client that was interested in them expanding <br />operations, so they came to the city council and asked for an abatement if they built the building, <br />their business model changed, they did not build the building, and therefore there was no taxes <br />assessed and there were no taxes paid. Mr. Harper said the 2006 tax abatement was null and void <br />and no one ever acted on it. <br />He said Council Member Clifford's allegations that a million dollars' worth of taxes were <br />abated, and that they were out of compliance for 2012 was all based on a '06 abatement that <br />never happened. He also said they did not build the building therefore they had no compliance <br />requirements. Mr. Harper informed everyone there were never any taxes assessed on it, they did <br />not have to create 158 full -time jobs because they didn't build the building and therefore they got <br />no benefit from the tax community. Mr. Harper said this was absurd that he had to defend their <br />organization or their family because Council Member Clifford provided information that he <br />knew prior to bringing it to the council, never happened. Mr. Harper said certain elected officials <br />were using their position for personal agendas and this had to stop in the community. He stated <br />they had a 2004 abatement agreement that had a requirement of 30 jobs, but they created 152 <br />jobs at the minimum. He also said it was abated for eight years, but should have been seven, and <br />he brought that up when he met with John Godwin, Pam Anglin, and Chuck Superville. He said <br />that Rebecca Clifford was also invited to that meeting, but did not attend. He said Mrs. <br />Clifford's recommendation that we were out of compliance, was all based on a 2006 abatement <br />and they didn't get a 2006 abatement. Mr. Harper said John Godwin sent all of that information <br />to everybody sitting up here, but they were getting slandered in front of the public on something <br />that never happened. He said this questionable behavior by elected and appointed officials had to <br />stop and referenced this happened on the PEDC Rogers and Wade incentive agreement where <br />they had documented appraisal information that came to the council and to the city attorney, but <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.