11/16/2015 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Regular Council Meeting November 16, 2015 Page 13 that never got shared. He also said subsequently $50,000 was spent on a PEDC investigation that was a waste of tax payers' money, because the investigation proved nothing. Mr. Harper said Council Member Clifford knew that the 2006 abatement was null and void but he chose to give this longwinded presentation about compliance, about people not doing the job correctly and that HWH got a million dollars' worth of taxpayers' money that got abated on a building that never was built. He said that they had the same thing happening from Council Member Clifford's brother Judge Clifford who was continuing to slander HWH /the Harper Family while he was getting reprimanded in public. He said everybody knows that the ongoing FBI investigation is not true. He said this was a pattern of mistreatment and this is a pattern of a problem all the way through. Mayor Hashmi cautioned Mr. Harper to stay on this agenda item, because of the agenda posting. Mr. Harper said this was a waste of public funds, a misuse of power for personal and political agendas and this was harmful to our community. He also said Paris was going to have to work really hard to build Paris' reputation, because Paris was a laughing stock in the State right now because of handling of these items. Council Member Clifford said his wife, Rebecca, was not invited to that meeting with the taxing entities. Mr. Harper said she was, but she could not come because she was out of town. Mrs. Clifford said she was not invited to the meeting. Council Member Clifford wanted to know what justified the 2012 and 2013 abatements. Mr. Harper said they got eight and it should have been seven. Council Member Clifford said the contract started in 2005 and ended in 2011, and then inquired about the justification of the tax abatements in 2012 and 2013. Mr. Harper said the 2013 abatement was not justified. Council Member Clifford asked about the 2012 abatement and Mr. Harper said it was a seven -year abatement. Council Member Clifford said they should go by the contract. Mr. Harper said when you go by the contract, it will show that the company overpaid taxes and he was working on that with the tax accessor. He also said if there was an error in evaluation or abatement, he would work with the appraisal district to work it out. Mr. Harper said if they owe money, they will pay it. Council Member Clifford said the contract that was signed in 2004, began in 2005 and was to have ended in 2011. He asked the city attorney if the abatement of taxes could be extended to 2012, if the abatement period began in 2005 and ended in 2011 according to the contract. The city attorney said it could not be extended under the contract. Mayor Hashmi confirmed with City Attorney Kent McIlyar that you could not start abating taxes until a building is built. Mr. Harper said he had a substantial completion document dated August 10, 2005. Mr. Harper said logically if you are going to invest 4.5 million dollars in the community, the city council, PJC, and the county say ok, business owner, if you're going to invest in the community, we're going to give you a seven -year abatement. The trade -off is the investment, so who cares if it is from 2006 -2012 or from 2005 -2011, because it is still a seven -year abatement. Mayor Hashmi inquired if the contract ended in 2011 or 2012, understanding the contract reflects a termination date of 2011 but the building wasn't built until 2006. Mr. McIlyar said according to the contract, it began in January 2005 and seven years later ended, in 201 I.Council