My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
19 & 20 - DISANNEXATION REQUESTS 36TH NE AND FM 79
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2011-2020
>
2016
>
01 JANUARY
>
01/25/2016
>
19 & 20 - DISANNEXATION REQUESTS 36TH NE AND FM 79
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2016 2:43:48 PM
Creation date
1/21/2016 2:40:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGENDA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ability to Provide Services and Facilities <br />Properties or an area should be annexed only to a municipality willing and able to provide fire <br />and police protection and refuse collection immediately and sanitary sewer and water service <br />within a reasonable period of time. Provision of sewer and water service should, however, not <br />be at the expense of areas already within the municipality that still do not have these services. <br />• Simplification of Municipal Boundaries <br />Annexations should be encouraged and enhanced that have the effect of consolidating a <br />community's corporate area and reducing the irregularities that previous annexations may have <br />added to the corporate limits. "Squaring off' the municipal limits to create an easily recog- <br />nizable shape can enhance the image that residents have of their municipality and create a <br />more logical shape for administering services. Also, more logical and easily definable <br />configurations of annexed property also provide the development community with <br />opportunities oftentimes to create developments that are more efficient and aesthetically <br />pleasing. Annexation lines should be drawn so as to avoid ribbons or odd pieces of <br />unincorporated land between communities. It is preferable for municipalities to abut and have <br />a common boundary rather than be separated by a small unincorporated area. <br />• Cost- Revenue Analysis <br />The deficit of income to be realized from the annexed area against the expenses to the <br />municipality in serving it should be reasonable. Cost - revenue analysis, a topic in itself and <br />beyond the scope of this report, can compare the annexation area's potential revenue base with <br />the costs of furnishing necessary services. For example, consideration should be given to a <br />situation whereby a city annexes a residential subdivision that was not built to that city's <br />subdivision standards. In the long -run, therefore, the current citizens within the annexing <br />municipality may have to pay for upgrading said potentially annexed subdivision. <br />• Economic Development <br />In conjunction with cost - benefit analysis, Paris can use annexation, where appropriate, as a tool <br />to stimulate local and regional economic growth and implement sound, long -range capital <br />improvement programming. A sub -tool for this kind of economic development could be, for <br />example, public - private partnerships and investments. <br />• Comprehensive Plans and Zoning District Maps <br />Texas does not allow zoning of unincorporated areas. Therefore, if property is annexed, it <br />should be zoned as soon as possible to be in conformance with the annexing municipalities' <br />future land use plan within its comprehensive plan. If such zoning does not occur in a timely <br />manner, the municipality runs the risk of having its recently annexed area developed with land <br />uses that may be incompatible with that city's land use plans, growth- goals, and policies. <br />• Parks, Recreation, and Open Space <br />Oftentimes, parks, recreation, and open space plans can be more fully implemented if linkages <br />can be made to other parks elements, to increase citizen use, city design, and aesthetic features. <br />In certain instances, therefore, it could be an important factor to annex areas outside of Paris <br />that could enhance trail systems, as well as use environmental resources that are presumably <br />outside the city (e.g., flood plan and /or other environmentally sensitive, archeological and /or <br />historical sites or interesting areas). <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.