My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08/08/2018 MInutes
City-of-Paris
>
Boards and Commissions
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2018
>
08/08/2018 MInutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/13/2018 2:17:56 PM
Creation date
9/13/2018 2:16:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Dekalb, Texas for the cost of duplicate siding, but found it cost prohibitive as the expense would include a <br />new knife, set fee, and oversized wooden pieces. Mr. Moore considered removing some siding from the back of the <br />house, but concluded there weren't enough sizes andpieces to work. Chairman Dux asked the commission if they <br />had further questions, and called for a motion. A motion was made by Glee Emmite, seconded by Randy Hider to <br />approve the use of the cedar shingles on the west facing fagade, limited to the area around the set of windows and <br />not to include under the porch. Motion carried 5 — 0 <br />C. 17 Clarksville ST- Facade repair/replacement- Janet Green <br />D. 21 Clarksville ST. FaVade repair/replacement- Janet Green <br />E. 27 Clarksville St. Removal of slipcover, and repair of existing historic facade -Janet <br />Green <br />17 Clarksville: Mrs. Green is determining how to finish out the lowerportion of the fagade after removing the <br />slip cover, and exposing the transom windows. Sheplans to repair the original transom. She showedpictures of <br />different types of store fronts around downtown. Herproposal includes recessing the storefront approximately 5 <br />feet and to include a configuration of two double doors flanking a single door in the middle, and the door design <br />that looked similar to a bulkhead. The doors would either be recycled ore purchased, and ifpurchased they will <br />be using fiberglass. Above each door would be another three sets of short wide windows to fill in the space. <br />Commissioner Dux asked if the transom windows were three sets of 4 windows each, and ifso, recommended that <br />the placement of the doors all align with the division of the transom for symmetry. Mrs. Green said that was the <br />intention. A motion was made to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness as presented by Commissioner <br />Emmite, seconded by Commissioner Vandiver, motion carried S — 0. <br />21 Clarksville: The upper windows story windows were discussed first, and Mrs. Green said she was getting <br />prices on the 4 over one window configuration, and asked if this was required. Chairman Dux said it would be <br />preferable to have this since this is what was on the building originally, but if it was not available, it would be <br />acceptable to do a one over one. Mrs. Green said she would continue to research the one over one as she liked <br />that look as well. Mrs. Green proposed two drawings One included a traditional storefront, having one large <br />door in the center, and two display windows and bulkhead. She also proposed the double door with divided light, <br />and the divided light display windows. A motion was made to approve the traditional storefront design by <br />Commissioner Vandiver seconded by Commissioner Emmite, motion carried S — 0. Mrs. Green would wait to <br />see what the design professionals come up with when the visit on August 10, 2018, and may return with the new <br />information. <br />27 Clarksville: Mrs Green presented pictures of the transom windows and the rear of the building under the slip <br />cover. She is concerned with the roof line, and how it may look on the historic building, but wanted to receive <br />approval to remove the slip cover from the commission in the event she request a grant. A motion was made to <br />approve the Certificate of Appropriateness to remove the fa(ade by Commissioner Emmite, seconded by <br />Commissioner Vandiver, seconded by Commissioner Emmite, motion carried S - 0 <br />F. 104 Bonham St. <br />There was not one present to answer questions about this certificate of appropriateness, so it was unclear if the <br />applicant was trying to mitigate a potentialproblem, or looking for a more permanent repair to the property to <br />hold the terracotta and cast stone pieces on the parapet wall shelf. <br />After discussion, Chairman Dux made the motion to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness with the <br />contingency that the application of tar paper or other substance to hold the terracotta and cast stone parapet wall <br />together is a temporary measure to mitigate further deterioration orpieces of stone falling. Commissioner <br />Lazar asked what the definition of temporary. Commissioner Hider asked how the tarpaper would actually keep <br />pieces from falling offfrom the wall. Commissioner Dux explained that the owner was attempting to support the <br />terracotta/cast stone similar to duct tape. He also clarified his motion to include the definition of temporary. <br />Motion to approve the use of the tar paper with the contingency that the property owner will submit to the <br />commission within 60 days the detailedplan for when permanent repairs they are going to take place and what <br />exactly the permanent repairs will be. Motion seconded by Glee Emmite, motion carried 5 - 0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.