04/14/2021 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

the congruency of the property. Commissioner Dux asked if this was the only one story structure, and Mrs. Norment explained the height is the same as the garage. The setback were approved by the city officials. Mrs. Norment went over the materials and verified they would be repurposed from a former structure that was on the property but was torn down. Same brick as on the original house. Same colors painted as on the original house and the same shingles. Commissioner Caffey noted the main house was all about gables, and had concerns that the hipped roof didn't speak the same language as the original house, when it comes to the street view. Commissioner Caffey asked about getting something over the entry door to give it the appearance of a gable roof Mrs. Norment said she didn't want to spend unnecessarily. Commissioner Vandiver noted the window in the drawing on the Brame street side didn't have the same detailing as the rest of the house, to which Mrs. Norment said the window was going to actually be a window type garage door, but when individuals are looking through the existing opening on the west side in the fence, the only thing that will be seen is backyard. With no further discussion, Chairman Dux called for a motion. Commissioner Long made the motion that the pool accessory building is congruent with the neighborhood in height, massing, setbacks, architectural detailing, fenestration and proportions with respect to the design standards, Commissioner Coyle seconded the motion. Motion carried 6-1 with Vice Chairman Caffey dissenting. A motion was made by Commissioner Vandiver to grant a certificate of appropriateness for the construction of a pool accessory structure as presented at 606 Church Street. Motion seconded by Commissioner Caffey. Motion carried 7-0 d. 136 Grand Ave, selective demo ori front fagade to reveal original windows configuration. Ms Gilliam gave a brief description on the project and their desire to restore the front of the property to the early 1900 fagade. In doing so the owners would want to remove a small portion of brick to see if there is any historic material underneath the fagade, and develop a game plan on either to begin full restoration after discovery phase. Chairman Dux asked the commission if they had any questions for the applicant. Commissioner Matthews made the motion that the investigative demo is congruent with the design standards. Seconded by Commissioner Caffey. Motion Carried 7 -0 Commissioner Vandiver to grant the certificate of appropriateness for selective demolition for the purpose of discovery to see what is existing beneath the existing infill and to develop a plan for rehabilitation. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Matthews, Motion Carried. e. 111 Lamar Ave, Front facade: addition of outdoor counter. The applicant withdrew the application to remodel the front fagade for further discussion. Rear fagadd of 111 Lamar Ave. Chairman Dux clarified the height of the windows next to the door. Each commissioner reviewed the height, materials to be used, fenestration proportions and appurtenant feathers and fixtures. Commissioner Caffey asked to be clear on the lining up of the doors heights in respect to the windows. The vertical alignment of the wooden panel above the door and the entry doors be congruent. Commissioner Caffey made the motion that the rear entries are congruent in materials, height, massing, and that the kickplate on the doors and tops of the windows hold a vertical alignment. Motion seconded by Commission Emmite, Motion carried 7 — 0