Laserfiche WebLink
10 acres. Minimum lot dimension requirements for the plat are met and all setbacks are <br />met. The approval conditions of the preliminary plat have been met. <br />A motion was made by Michael Mosher, seconded by Clifton Fendley to approve the final plat. <br />Motion carried 6-0. <br />7. Consideration of and action on the Preliminary Plat of the Burley Addition, Lot 1, Block <br />A, LCAD Property ID 16440, located at 719 SW Yd Street. <br />Mack states the applicant requested plat approval for the demolition and re -construction <br />of a single family residence through the HOME Program. The subject property is zoned <br />MF -1. The site is 0.56 acres. Minimum lot dimension requirements for the plat are met <br />and all setbacks can be met.All submission requirements for the preliminary and final <br />plats have been met. Staff recommends approval. <br />A motion was made by Clifton Fendley, seconded by Michael Mosher to approve the preliminary <br />plat. Motion carried 6-0. <br />8. Consideration of and action on the Final Plat of the Burley Addition, Lot 1, BlockA, LCAD <br />Property ID 16440, located at 719 SW 31d Street. <br />Mack states this is the same plat for the final. Staff recommends approval. <br />A motion was made by Clifton Fendley, seconded by Tylesha Ross -Mosley to approve the final <br />plat. Motion carried 6-0. <br />9. Consideration of and action on the Preliminary Plat of the Downs 298 Addition, Lot 1, <br />Block A, LCAD Property 128379, located at 1315 NW Loop 286. <br />Mack states that Lance Downs requested preliminary & final plat approval for the Downs <br />298 Addition located at 1315 NW Loop 286. This plat involves an approximate 3 1/3rd <br />acre division off of a larger 27 acre un -platted parcel. This will facilitate the 2nd phase of <br />the Rentone, LLC/ AAA. Mini Storage project. Neither the current owner, nor the prior <br />owner/developer of the site has provided a clear master concept plan identifying how this <br />property is intended to be developed in the future. In this regard, it makes it difficult to <br />determine what is the best planning strategy for laying out future roadway and access plans <br />for the larger area. Although both Phase 1 & 2 are owned by the same person at this point, <br />this can change over time. Therefore, without a clearly identified master development plan, <br />shared private access and utility easements for the property are needed. With this a <br />coordinated development pattern over time can be a challenge. Staff was met with a number <br />of technical concerns in working through this plat and development plan with applicant <br />and surveyor. A number of these issues have been addressed with the revised plat <br />submittals, however, a number of concerns remain to be addressed as identified by the City <br />