My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-08-2023
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2023
>
08-08-2023
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2024 10:48:11 AM
Creation date
8/15/2023 8:30:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
permit issuance, permit tracking, inspections, council and board actions, etc. The demand on frontline staff <br />has increased tremendously in the City Hall Annex Building. Andrew Mack, Director of Planning and <br />Community Development, would like to add a front desk position who will relieve existing staff, who have <br />technical responsibilities in permitting, zoning, tracking, planning, housing, main street, etc., of these critical <br />yet time consuming front desk duties. This position will be stationed inside the front room of the City Hall <br />Annex and will handle the technical questions related to the Community Development and Fire Marshal's <br />office that the City Clerk Secretary cannot. We want to be responsive to not only those who come through <br />the front door, but also those who are communicating with us on the backend as well as expecting responses <br />to inquiries sent in to our technical staff. This position will help provide some relief for our Permit Tech and <br />Deputy City Clerk who both primarily cover the front desk, but also provide direct assistance to Mr. Mack <br />and Cheri Bedford, Main Street Coordinator and Historic Commission Officer, while also benefiting the <br />entire department via an upward ripple effect of relief and assistance. We also foresee this position potentially <br />relieving the Fire Department Secretary of various Code Enforcement Department secretarial duties that have <br />continued on since when this department was subsidiary to the Fire Department a few years ago. The budget <br />impact for this position is minimal, but the operational impact to the overall department and its divisions will <br />be tremendous. <br />9. Maintaining Operational Services — Despite the significant challenges and priorities mentioned above, the <br />Proposed FY23/24 Budget is also designed to maintain operational services for our citizens. Throughout the <br />entire budget, it is clear to me that the City Staff continue to do a great job of being frugal, consistent, and <br />conscientious of the tax payer dollar. Departments are steadily providing the services under the same budgets <br />year after year, only with minimal increases to account for increases in prices. We continue to set individual <br />line item budgets such that it matches the true cost to provide the service as seen over the prior few years. <br />Any adjustments up or down are for known reasons (a new piece of equipment, dropping the need for a <br />particular subscription, better pricing through new bids, increases in service costs, etc.). While there is much <br />more we would like to do for our citizens, we respect that resources are limited and will continue to use them <br />as wisely as we can to impact the most individuals possible. <br />10. Texas Property Tax Reform and Transparency Act of 2019 — This Act was passed by the Texas Legislature <br />in 2019. This represents a fairly comprehensive amendment to how Municipalities in Texas prepare their <br />budgets. This Act first took effect in FY20/21. A large amount of the Act changes how the Texas Comptroller <br />operates, but there is a fair amount of edits to how the City of Paris must handle the procedure of passing a <br />budget (notices, deadlines, public hearings, content of material produced, etc.), but the primary and long <br />lasting impact that the City of Paris will feel for years to come is the restriction in Property Tax Growth. The <br />Texas Municipal League (TML) has produced an Explanatory Q&A, found on their website. The reader can <br />also read S132 directly, but I would strongly recommend starting with the TML Q&A first to give you an idea <br />of what it is you are reading in the Act. The Act is rather complicated. <br />The TML Q&A does a very good job of capturing the essence of SB2. <br />"At its most fundamental level, S.B. 2 reforms the system of property taxation in three primary ways: (1) <br />lowering the tax rate a taxing unit can adopt without voter approval and requiring a mandatory election to <br />go above the lowered rate; (2) making numerous changes to the procedure by which a city, adopts a tax rate; <br />and (3) making several changes to the property tax appraisal process. " <br />The Act produces the following formula when calculating our new Property Tax Rate: <br />"Voter -Approval Rate = (No -New -Revenue Maintenance and Operations Rate x 1.035) + Current Debt <br />Service Tax Rate" <br />In short, the City of Paris can only grow its Maintenance and Operational Tax Rate by 3.5% each year <br />without, possibly, triggering a mandatory election (hence the "Voter Approval" terminology). Cities with <br />Page 15 of 23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.