Laserfiche WebLink
1.14IRREGULAR PROPOSAL <br />A. Proposals will not be considered if they show any omissions, alterations of form, additions, <br />conditions not requested, unauthorized alternate proposals, or irregularities of any kind. However, <br />Owner reserves the right to waive any irregularities and to make the award in the best interest of <br />Owner. <br />1.15REJECTION OF PROPOSAL <br />A.The Proposer acknowledges the right of Owner to reject any or all proposals and to waive any <br />informality or irregularity in any proposal received. In addition, the Proposer recognizes the right <br />of Owner to reject a proposal if the Proposer failed to furnish any required proposal security, or to <br />submit the data required by the proposal documents, or if the proposal is in any way deemed <br />incomplete or irregular. <br />1.16SELECTION CRITERIA AND OWNER EVALUATION <br />A.Owner intends to select for further negotiation, and based on that process, to award the contract to <br />the Proposer whose proposal represents the best value to Owner according to the selection criteria <br />and the relative weighting set forth herein. The selection criteria that Owner will use in designating <br />the order of negotiation and in selecting the successful Proposer and the relative weighting of such <br />criteria are as follow: <br />Selection Criteria <br />Price: <br />1. The quoted price, cost methodology, alternatives proposed, and markup for <br />changes.. <br />Proposed construction time: <br />2. the time projected to perform all services covered by the total <br />price. <br />Proposer’s record of maintaining construction schedule: <br />3. The proposer’s past record of <br />timely completion. <br />Proposer’s safety record and program: <br />4. Number of accidents on prior jobs. <br />Proposer’s quality control program: <br />5.How quality of workmanship is monitored and <br />maintained. <br />Financial resources: <br />6. The financial viability of the Contractor. <br />Cost reduction suggestions: <br />7. The value and viability of cost savings measures presented in <br />the proposal. <br />Proposer’s references: <br />8. References that have personal knowledge of the proposing firm’s <br />reputation and quality of work. <br />Experience and qualifications: <br />9. Recent experience in the construction of projects of <br />comparable size and complexity, experience with municipal facilities of comparable size <br />and complexity, and experience with facilities in Owner’s geographical area. <br />-13- <br /> <br />