My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-G Senate Bill 7
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2001-2010
>
2003
>
02 - February
>
2003-02-10
>
07-G Senate Bill 7
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2005 11:20:50 AM
Creation date
2/5/2003 10:56:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGENDA
Item Number
7G
AGENDA - Type
RESOLUTION
Description
Senate Bill 7 Endorsement
AGENDA - Date
2/10/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Transition to Competition Has Been Marked By Failed or <br />Delayed Switching and Billing, Resulting in New and Difficult <br />Budgeting Burdens on Cities. <br /> <br /> One of the pervasive problems with the retail market has been the tardiness in switching <br />customers to their new provider and the inability of the customer to receive the full benefit of the <br />contract signed with the new provider. Despite several months of lead-time prior to the start of <br />competition, numerous CAPP and STAP accounts were not timely transferred to their provider <br />of choice. <br /> <br />Switching Delays Resulted in the Loss of Anticipated Savings. <br /> <br /> · In December 2001, the City of Nacogdoches submitted 130 points of delivery for <br /> transition to a new PEP. After three months of not receiving any bill for electric <br /> service, Nacogdoches received the first bills from the new REP on April 15, 2002. <br /> However, the initial billing statement included only 63 of the 130 accounts <br /> submitted. It took four more months before all of Nacogdoches' accounts were <br /> finally switched to the provider the City had requested in December 2001. <br /> <br /> · The City of Aransas Pass only recently received final bills for two accounts that were <br /> supposed to be transferred in January. <br /> <br /> · Some City of Plano accounts were not transferred until October and November of <br /> last year. <br /> <br /> · Fifteen accounts for the City of Denison, 18 City of Plano accounts, 31 City of Alice <br /> accounts, and 60 City of Grand Prairie accounts have yet to be switched to their <br /> selected provider, more than one year at~er competition began. <br /> <br /> · From a budgeting standpoint, Cities have been forced to estimate usage and accrue <br /> projected expenses for large accounts. <br /> <br /> · The City of Allen was building a new natatorium at the end of 2001, and its new <br /> account information was included with the accounts that were transferred to a new <br /> provider in December 2001. The first billing for the natatorium was not received by <br /> the City until July 2002. The City was billed for August and September usage, but <br /> has not yet received a bill for October and November. More concerning from a <br /> budgeting perspective, the City has yet to receive a single bill for its newly <br /> constructed Central Fire Station (completed at the end of 2001). The facility has been <br /> estimated to use 1.5 million kWh per year, but no bills have been issued confirming <br /> this projection. <br /> <br /> · It took almost six months for accounts for the new police and courts facility to be <br /> switched from the contractor to the City of Euless. <br /> <br />1 g 13\O0~na¢~ano030113grog 4 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.