Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />February 9, 2004 <br />Page 16 <br /> <br />change the applications would be too complicated, but that some of these could <br />be used as sub-categories for the categories already there. <br /> <br />Councilman Bell indicated that he wanted to discuss scoring on all evaluations <br />when they got to that subject. <br /> <br />It was the consensus to leave item four in the evaluation. <br /> <br />Mayor Fendley directed the Council's attention to No. 5, Work Habits. He <br />thought it would be indicated by the fines the Municipal Judge collects. Mayor <br />Fendley asked Municipal Court Judge Hunt how many hours he worked. The <br />Judge replied between 80 and 100 hours. All agreed to omit this item. <br /> <br />Mayor Fendley said that item No. 6, Planning Skills could be a time <br />management issue. Mayor Pro Tem McCarthy asked how the Council would <br />now if the Municipal Court Judge managed his time wisely. Councilman Plata <br />agreed. All agreed to delete item No. 6. <br /> <br />Supervisory Skills and Leadership was item No. 7. Mayor Fendley thought this <br />would be appropriate for any of the evaluations, although the Council would not <br />know how the employees responded to his supervisory skills. Mayor Pro Tem <br />McCarthy said if the employees were dissatisfied, someone would know about <br />it. Mayor Fendley thought this went back to Equity and Fairness, not only with <br />the citizens but also with the staff. He thought some of this could be combined. <br />Councilman Guest suggested this be made a sub-heading under item No. 3. <br />Councilwoman Neeley related that it already said, under the explanation for <br />item No. 3, concern for fair treatment of citizens, employees and others. Mayor <br />Pro Tem McCarthy suggested that item No. 3, Equity and Fairness, be left in <br />and item No. 7, Supervisory and Leadership skills be taken out. All agreed. <br /> <br />On item No. 8, Council Requests, Councilwoman Neeley thought, although <br />there wasn't a problem with this one at present, it should be left in for the <br />future. The consensus was to leave this item in. <br /> <br />Mayor Fendley brought the Council's attention to the next item on the <br /> <br /> <br />