1999 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Curtis Fendley was excused from consideration of this item. Motion made by Joe McCarthy and seconded by Louis Yates. Motion carried by a vote of 8 ayes and 0 nays. 7. Consideration of and action on the petition of the City of Paris for a change in zoning from a Multiple Family Dwelling District No. 1 (MF -1) to a Public Lands and Institutions District (PLI), Lot 1, City Block 152, being number 829 Brame. Motion was made to table item by Bill Coleman and seconded by Marshall Kent, request was made for Paris Housing Authority to attend next meeting to explain reasons. Motion carried by a vote of 8 ayes and 0 nays. Motion was made by Joe McCarthy and seconded by Marshall Kent for Curtis Fendley to return. Motion carried by a vote of 8 ayes and 0 nays. Public Hearing to consider the petition of Monte Moore for a change in zoning from an Agricultural District (A) to a Multiple Family Dwelling District No. 1 (MF -1) and Planned Development al Commercial District (PD- al), Pt. of Lot 5, City Block 318, being numbers 1100 thru 1300 N.E. 34th Street. The public hearing was declared open. Mr. Monte Moore, 2010 Lamar Avenue, spoke in favor of the petition, also handed out small drawing of what he intended to do with the property. He wants rezoning considered as two separate issues. He would like Multiple Family zoning along 34th N.E. and Commercial Center (PD -al) along Loop 286. Would like 120 feet deep along 34th N.E. rezoned for Multiple Family. A sketch was shown of Commercial Center, approximately 250 x 250 for mini warehouses and RV storage. A surface water runoff study done by Chaney Engineering as well as a letter showing that Chaney was retained was also presented. Mr. Moore stated that progress does impact traffic but rezoning and progress must proceed. He expects his project will add $2,000,000 to tax base. He intends to leave the remainder of the property as Agriculture. Ms. Jackie Wood, 3415 Vegas Drive, spoke in opposition to the petition stating that he was concerned with traffic, however, he was not opposed to Single Family zoning. She is against Commercial zoning with access from 34th N.E. Ms. Patsy Guest, 1815 34th N.E., spoke in opposition. She has 45 acres north of the project and wonders why the best use for the property couldn't be residential. She feels Planned Development would allow everybody to completely understand