1988 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

4 - ,', xa 44- ''L"' MINUTES OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MAY 2, 1988 The Planning and Zoning Commission met in regular session Monday, May 2, 1988, at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Room, City Hall, Paris, Texas, with the following members present: 1. Freddy Swaim - Chairman 4. Bill Davidson 2. Ozie Battle 5. Bruce McMonigle 3. Charles Christian 6. Kyle Perry Also present was Joe McCollum, Director of Community Development. Chairman Swaim called the meeting to order and the minutes of April 4 and April 6 were approved as presented. Chairman Swaim opened the public hearing on the petition of Ever Hilliard for a change in zoning from a Multi- Family Dwelling District No. 1 (MF -1) -to a General Retail District (GR) on Lot 9, City Block 102 -C located at 117 S.E. 16th Street. Mrs. Hilliard was present and told the Commission she wanted to locate her dental lab at this location. She said the lab was presently in a small building at 532 Lamar Avenue and she proposes to move it to 117 S.E. 16th Street and construct a 16' x 16' addition to it. She said she would provide off street parking for employees and the occasional customer that might come in since most of her work is delivered to customers. No one else was present to speak on the matter and the public hearing was closed. It was pointed out that the lot is bounded on two sides by retail zoning and a motion was made by Mr. Christian to recommend approval of the petition. Mr. Perry seconded the motion which carried 6 ayes, 0 nays. Chairman Swaim declared the public hearing open on the petition of H -W Investments for a change in zoning from a One Family Dwelling District No.2 (SF -2) to a Commercial District (C) on part of Lot 14, City Block 259 located south of Loop 286 N.E. between Collegiate Drive and 31st N. E. No one was present to represent the applicant. Several persons were in attendance to oppose the change in zoning. A.W. Clem IV, representing Mrs. Mary Smith of 1210 N. Collegiate Drive, listed several objections to the change on her behalf. He said the proposed Commercial tract was bounded on two sides by single family residential zoning and that any shopping center of the size proposed should be in a Planned Development zoning to afford as much protection as possible to adjacent residents. He added that the drainage to _.