Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />>ituation behind his client's home was deplorable and the noise and <br />usual effect from the shopping center would be undesirable. He <br />°equested denial of the petition. <br />lob Weddle, 925 Bunker Street, said he and other residents in <br />>pringlake Estates bought in the area based on residential zoning. He <br />)bjected to additional traffic through his neighborhood. <br />like Hutchings, 1220 N. Collegiate Drive, stated he had put up with the <br />)ad drainage situation behind his lot for 10 years and was interested <br />in what the developer planned to do about it. <br />lazel Daughtery, 1150 N. Collegiate Drive, also complained about the <br />lrainage saying it was impossible to enjoy her back yard because of <br />iosquitos. <br />flake Kreple, 815 Bunker, stated he needed to know the developer's plan <br />>efore he could form an opinion. <br />lrs. Jane Parker, 910 Bunker Drive and Randy Avery, 3095 Briarwood, were <br />:oncerned about additional traffic.if 31st N.E. were opened to the Loop. <br />om Hergenrader, 2925 Briarwood, said another shopping center would <br />can more empty buildings around the City and would tend to decrease <br />he value of his home. <br />3 one else spoke and the public hearing was closed. <br />ie Commission discussed the need for Planned Development Zoning to <br />otter control such developments and following discussion, Mr. <br />:Monigle made a motion to recommend denial of the change. Mrs. Battle <br />,conded the motion which carried 6 ayes, 0 nays. <br />e meeting then adjourned. <br />N. McCollum <br />:retary ex officio <br />1: dep <br />