1984 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

not.object to the Braum's Store as long as the south 93 feet was left undeveloped. He asked for assurance of this and was told that under Planned Development Zoning, the approved Site Plan determined how the property would be used. ^j-- Ross Porter, 2112 W. Kaufman objected to the proposal saying the back of the store would be visable from his front door and the proposed driveway on 21st S.W. would put unneeded traffic in front of his property. Scott Gentry, 2035 W. Kaufman said his only objection would be to any thing built on Kaufman Street but was concerned about drainage problems in the area. Audrey Talley, 2113 W. Kaufman, voiced concern about the area being a gathering place for hoodlums and drug users. Mr. Hutchison stated that Braum's was a family oriented business and has a reputation for maintaining their property in good condition. There was no one else to speak and the public hearing was closed. Screening of a trash container was discussed and Mr. Nutt made a motion to recommend approval of the zoning change provided that a 6 foot high solid fence be placed along the south side of the developed portion of the property and that lighting be directed away from the adjacent residents. Mr. McMonigle seconded the motion which carried 8 ayes, 0 nays. Chairman Swaim declared the public hearing open on the petition of D.L. Collard for a change in zoning from.a One Family Dwelling District No. 2 (SF -2) to a Multi- Family Dwelling District No. 1 (MF -1) on Lot 1 -A, Block 3, Mayer Addition located on the northtide of Bonham Street, 75 feet west of 31st N.W. T Brad Hutchison, Attorney representing Mr. Collard, stated that a 2 or 4 family dwelling approximately 1600 sq. ft. in area was proposed for this 75` X 125' lot. The units would be adjacent to his home on the corner of 31st N.W. and Bonham Street. Virginia Bills, speaking for Smith Kiker and his sister, stated that the Kiker property on the southside of Bonham Street opposite the Collard tract, was the last large tract of land in the area which was virtually undeveloped. She said that except for a beauty shop on 32nd N.W., all the property was single family and she hated to see a breakdown in single family use. She said the apartments might crowd the lot. Mr. Hutchison pointed out that the 4 units with a total area of 1600 sq. ft. would be no larger than most of the single family homes in the vicinity. There was no further comments and the public hearing was closed. Followingdiscussion Mr. Hildreth made a motion to recommend approval of the change. Mr. Perry seconded the motion which carried 8 ayes, 0 nays. Chairman Swaim announced they would next consider the annexation and proper zoning upon annexation of a 149 acre tract of land located on both sides of d 4