1984 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

f $ 1 WTI' I A A letter was introduced from C.L. Walker requesting that they be permitted to continue the alley width of 12 feet throughout the remainder of the Springlake Estates which had been previously approved for Phase I, II and III of the Subdivision. The letter is marked Exhibit B and attached hereto. Mr. Pine presented his comments on the 12' width saying that the Regulations required a 16' paving width but 12' worked well and discouraged two -way traffic in alleys. He said if the Commission approved the 12' width, he would request that the Regulations be amended to allow the lesser width in future developments. Following discussion, Mrs. Smith made a motion to allow the variance under the provisions of Section XVI of the Regulations. Mr. Nutt seconded the motion which carried 8 ayes, 0 nays. The Replat of Lots 3 and 6, Block U, Tanglewood Addition was recommended for approval on a motion by Mrs. Battle, seconded by Mr. Hildreth subject to the exceptions listed in City Engineer's Memorandum dated April 2, 1984, marked Exhibit C and attached hereto. The motion carried 8 ayes, 0 nays. The Replat of Lots 8, 9 and 10, Block 1, F.O. Reed Addition was recommended for approval on a motion by Mr. Perry, seconded by Mr. McMonigle, subject to the exceptions listed in City Engineer's Memorandum dated April 2, 1984, marked Exhibit D and attached hereto. The motion carried 8 ayes, 0 nays. The Final Plat of Paris Bible Church Addition was recommended for approval on a motion by Mrs. Smith, seconded by Mrs. Battle, subject to the exceptions listed in City Engineer's Memorandum dated April 2, 1984, marked Exhibit E and attached hereto. The motion carried 8 ayes, 0 nays. The Replat of Lot 9, City Block 259 was recommended for approval on a motion by Mr. Perry, seconded by Mrs. Battle, subject to the exceptions listed in -- City Engineer's Memorandum dated April 2, 1984, marked Exhibit F and attached hereto. The motion carried 8 ayes, 0 nays. The Final Plat of Wolf Creek Subdivision and Beaver Lake Subdivision located west of U.S. Highway 271 approximately 5 miles north of the Paris City Limits were presented by Mr. McCollum who advised that due to their location, approval by the City of Paris was required. He reviewed the policy of leaving construction standards to the County on' developments between 2 and 5 miles from the City Limits and stated there were no major roads to plan for involving the two subdivisions. A motion was made by Mr. Nutt, seconded by Mr. Perry to recommend approval of the Final Plat of Wolf Creek Subdivision. The motion carried 8 ayes, 0 nays. A motion was made by Mr. Nutt, seconded by Mrs. Battle to recommend approval of the Beaver Lake Final Plat, The motion carried 8 ayes, 0 nays. The Replat of Lots 14 -A - 14 -D, City Block 170 -C was recommended for approval on a motion by Mr.. McMonigle, seconded by Mr. Perry, subject to the exceptions listed in City Engineer's Memorandum dated April 2, 1984, marked Exhibit G and attached hereto with the further stipulation that the developer's engineer address item 4 in the memorandum when the plat is presented to the City Council on April 5, 1984. The motion carried 8 ayes, 0 nays. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. Joe N. McCollum Secretary, ex officio i