1985 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

k _ {s There was no one else present to speak on this petition and the public hearing was dlosed. Discussion followed and a motion was made by Mr. Perry, seconded by Mr. Christian to recommend approval of the change. The motion carried 7 ayes, 0 nays. Chairman Swaim declared the public hearing open on the petition of James R. Coleman for a change in zoning from a One Family Dwelling District No. 2 (SF -2) to a General Retail District (GR) on Lots 3 and 4, Block 2, Stellrose Addition located on the northeast corner of Clarksville Street and 23rd S.E. Mr. Coleman stated he represented himself and his brother who are owners of the property since the death of his mother earlier in the year. He said neither of them proposed to live in the house which needs repair and felt it no longer had real value as a residence due to its location. He pointed out the existing service station east of the house, the church parking lot and offices across the street and the grocery store 3 lots west as reasons for changing the zoning on the lot. He said it would be offered for sale as a business site. There was no one else present who wished to speak and the public hearing was closed. Following disccssion, a motion was made by Mr. Perry, seconded by Mrs. Smith to recommend approval of the change. The motion carried 7 ayes, 0 nays. Chairman Swaim declared the public hearing open on the petition of John H. Arnold for a change in zoning from a Two Family Dwelling District (2F) to an I-- Office District (0) on Lot 1, City Block 220 -A located at 203 20th N.E. John Bell was present representing Mr. Arnold. He stated the property was presently occupied by a 3 bedroom frame house which is rented out. He said the property is for sale and recent office development along this section of 20th N.E. gives this property the potential for office use also. There was no one else present to speak on the matter and the public hearing was closed. Discussion followed and a motion was made by "Mr. Christian, seconded by Mr. McMoni -gle to recommend approval of the change. The motion carried 7 ayes, 0 nays. The Replat of Lot 13, City Block 142 was presented by the City Engineer along with his recommendations. A drainage problem was discussed along the front of the property with Mack Russell, the developer. Mr. McCollum pointed out that the lots proposed were less than the standard size for the zoning district it is in but existing lots in the immediate vicinity were similar in size. He recommended approval of the variation in lot size as provided for in Section XVI (B) of the Subdivision Regulations. Following discussion a motion was made by Mr. Christian, seconded by Mr. McMonigle to recommend approval of the Replat subject to the exceptions listed in City Engineer's Memorandum dated January 7, 1985, marked Exhibit A and attached hereto and granting the variation in lot size. The motion carried 7 ayes, 0 nays. P 4 r 1� e� } t 1