1978 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

property, and that the petitioner did not object to the General Retail classification as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission rather than the Commercial District originally requested. Mayor Malone called for opponents to appear and none appeared. Ordinance No. 2389 "AN ORDINANCE AMEND -ING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 1710 OF THE CITY OF PARIS, PARIS, TEXAS, AND CHANGING THE BOUNDARIES ESTABLISHED BY THE ZONING MAP OF SAID CITY; ESTABLISHING A GENERAL RETAIL DISTRICT (GR) ON A PART OF LOT 1, BLOCK B, JEFFERSON HEIGHTS ADDITION, ON PROPERTY BELONGING TO LESLIE.ECHOLS, SO AS TO INCLUDE-THEREIN TERRITORY FORMERLY DESIGNATED AS A ONE- FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT NO. 2 (SF -2); AND DESIGNATING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE GENERAL RETAIL DISTRICT (GR) SO ESTABLISHED." was presented. A motion was made by Councilman Williams, seconded by Councilman Burnett for adoption of the ordinance. The motion carried 7 ayes., 0 nays. Mayor Malone advised that the next order of business would be consideration of Apftoval of replat of Lot 24, City Block 312, located on the north side of Clairksyille Street between 34th S.E. and 36th S.E. Councilman Farris requested to be excused from this item on the agenda. Motion was made by Councilman Williams, seconded by'Councilman Wunsch.to excuse Councilman Farris. Motion carried 7 ayes, 0 nays. .Councilman Farris left the Council Chambers. Mr. Brad Hutchison, Attorney, appeared representing Mr. Join R gert, stating that there was access to the property involved rather than being land locked lot, and that the purpose of tNe plat was to create a residential building site for Lot �4B which would have dcces� to'A public street y_81 wide easement at oss Lot 2AA belong- ing to Dr. Larry Walk&. Mt. Hutchison adV�led that'a fire hydr= alas withiI" i9d' and located on CardloAl Lane. Discussion was had between City Attorney Hayhes acid Mr. Hlitchl son bohcerni ng local statute regulating lots without access to public streets. Mayor Malone advised that this iteri would bd hassed for later' in the meeting giving an opportunity for the City Attorney to search the Code of Ordinances. City Manager Sokoll presented a Replat of Lot 1, City Block 266, and noted that the Planning and Zoning Commission had recommended its approval.. A motion was made by Councilman Williams, seconded by Councilman Wunsch approving the replat. Motion carried 6 ayes, 0 nays. Councilman Farris entered the - Council Chamber and assumed his chair. City Attorney Haynes presented the following petitions for re- zoning: Gene McWaters, Jr., part of Lot 1, City Block 344 from Agriculture and Single Family Dwelling rx